dpp v murray

391 results for dpp v murray

  • vLex Rating
  • B.J. -v- DPP, [2007] IESC 18 (2007)

    ...The law on prosecutorial delay has been restated recently by this Court. In P.M. v. The Director of Public Prosecutions [2006] I.E.S.C. 22, Kearns J., with whom Murray C.J., Denham J., Hardiman J., and Geoghegan J. concurred, set out the test to be applied to the issue of prosecutorial delay as: "In conclusion, however, on this issue, I am satisfied that where ...

  • Breathnach -v- D.P.P. & ors, [2001] IESC 23 (2001)
  • H. S. E. -v- Judge White, [2009] IEHC 242

    ...In his judgment Murray J. (as he then was) sets out the High Court judge's reasoning for making the orders in question. He said:. "…there were four factors which the learned High Court Judge stated at p. 84 he should take ...

  • Atlantic Shellfish Ltd & Anor, [2007] IEHC 215 (2006)

    ... either to advance his own case or damage the case of his adversary, if it is a document which may fairly lead him to a train of inquiry which may have either these two consequences."As Murray J. stated in Aquatechnologie Limited v. The National Standards Authority of Ireland (Unreported, Supreme Court, 10th July, 2000.) at p. 11:-"[T]here is nothing in that statement which is intended to ...

  • Grogan -v- The Parole Board & Anor, [2008] IEHC 204 (2008)

    ...in Murray v. Ireland [1991] I.L.R.M. 465, and cited with approval by Hardiman J. in Kinahan v. Minister for Justice [2001] 4 I.R. 454 at p. 459. The Irish case law relating to the temporary release of ...

  • Grogan -v- The Parole Board & Anor, [2008] IEHC 204 (2008)

    ...in Murray v. Ireland [1991] I.L.R.M. 465, and cited with approval by Hardiman J. in Kinahan v. Minister for Justice [2001] 4 I.R. 454 at p. 459. The Irish case law relating to the temporary release of ...

  • D.P.P. -v- Edgeworth, [2001] IESC 31 (2001)

    THE SUPREME COURTKeane C.J. 154/00. Denham, J. Murphy J. Murray J. Hardiman J. IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL PURSUANT. TO SECTION 34 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. 1967 and IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE OF A . QUESTION OF LAW TO THE SUPREME COURT FOR. DETERMINATION. ...

  • Gordon -v- DPP, [2002] IESC 47 (2002)

    ...The case was presented by Inspector Moynihan, who had been stationed in Ballina for some months. The only witness for the prosecution was Garda Pauline Murray, a member of the Gardaí attached to Swinford Garda Station, who gave the evidence regarding the taking of the urine sample from the appellant. The sample was taken, she said, in the toilet in the ...

  • Director of Corporate Enforcement -v- DCC PLC & Ors, [2008] IEHC 260 (2008)

    ...(a) Public Interest . The court is entitled to have consideration for the public interest in deciding whether or not to appoint inspectors. As was said by Murray J. in Dunnes Stores Ireland Company v. Ryan [2002] 2 I.R. 60,"While the Companies Acts generally include provisions relating to the incorporation, registration and structure of companies, as well as ...

  • Director of Corporate Enforcement -v- DCC PLC & Ors, [2008] IEHC 260 (2008)

    ...(a) Public Interest . The court is entitled to have consideration for the public interest in deciding whether or not to appoint inspectors. As was said by Murray J. in Dunnes Stores Ireland Company v. Ryan [2002] 2 I.R. 60,"While the Companies Acts generally include provisions relating to the incorporation, registration and structure of companies, as well as ...

  • Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform -v- Brennen, [2007] IESC 21 (2007)

    THE SUPREME COURT. Murray C.J. 121/06. Macken J. Finnegan J. Between. MINISTER FOR JUSTICE, EQUALITY & LAW REFORMAPPLICANT / RESPONDENT-v-. JOHN PAUL BRENNANRESPONDENT / APPELLANT. JUDGMENT of Murray C.J. delivered on the 4th ...

  • D.P.P.-v- Lynda Lee, [2004] IECCA 18 (2004)

    THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL [C.C.A. No. 13 of 1999]. Murray, J. Lavan, J. O'Caoimh, J. THE PEOPLE AT THE SUIT OF THE. DI0RECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONSRespondentAnd. LYNDA LEE Applicant Judgment of the court delivered by Murray J. on the 20th day of July, ...

  • Hughes -v- Judge Garavan & Anor, [2003] IESC 65 (2003)

    THE SUPREME COURT . JUDICIAL REVIEW. Murray J. McGuinness J. Hardiman J. No. 3/2002. BETWEEN/. FIONN HUGHES. Applicant. and. JUDGE JOHN GARAVAN AND THE. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS. Respondents. JUDGMENT of Mrs. Justice McGuinness ...

  • Payne v District Judge John Brophy & Anor, [2006] IEHC 34 (2006)

    ...7. Remittal. 7.1 In assessing the factors to be taken into account in considering whether to remit Murray J. (speaking for the Supreme Court) in Nevin v. Crowley [2001] 1 I.R. 113 said:-"This court, in Sweeney V. Judge Brophy [1993] 2 I.R. 202 at p.211, held that the proper exercise of a court's ...

  • Hannigan -v- DPP, [2001] IESC 10 (2001)
  • Kildare County Council v An Bord Pleanala, [2006] IEHC 173 (2006)

    ...On behalf of the respondent Mr. Brian Murray S.C. submitted that the Board was conscious that it was not its function to prescribe what the applicant might do to alleviate the acknowledged traffic problems in the context of its refusal of the ...

  • P.J. (aka) P.J.C -v- The Director of Public Prosecutions, [2005] IEHC 98 (2005)

    ...(as he then was) in P.C. v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1999] 2 I.R. 25 at p. 68 and also judgments of Murray J. and Hardiman J. in P.O.C. v. Director of Public Prosecutions [2000] 3 I.R. 87 at pages 106 and 118-119 respectively. It is further contended that the delay is further prejudicial to the applicant ...

  • D.P.P.-v- John Gallagher, [2006] IECCA 110 (2006)

    ...O'Neill J. Gilligan J. BETWEEN. THE PEOPLE AT THE SUIT OF . THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS-v-. JOHN GALLAGHERAPPLICANTJUDGMENT of the Court delivered on the 28th day of July, 2006 by . Murray C.J. The applicant, John Gallagher, was convicted at the Circuit Criminal Court on the 11th October, 2002 of the offence of possession of a controlled drug for the purpose of selling or otherwise ...

  • D.P.P. -v- Daniel Doherty, [2009] IECCA 17

    ... 411, dealing with counsel's conduct of a trial: "It has already been noted that, when delivering the judgment of the court on the hearing of the second interlocutory application in this case, Murray J. said that the conduct of a trial, including steps taken preliminary to the trial by an accused's legal advisers could, in exceptional circumstances, give rise to a ground of appeal. That view is ...

  • T.D. -v- The Minister for Education & ors, [2001] IESC 101 (2001)

    JUDGMENT BY: Murray J. TABLE OF CONTENTS. THE SUPREME COURT. T.D (A MINOR) AND ORS. -V-. THE MINISTER FOR EDUCATION AND ORS. Judgement of Murray J. 1CONTENTS PAGE. The Appeal 3. The High Court Order 5. The Judgement of ...

  • Kennedy -v- D.P.P. & Anor, [2007] IEHC 3 (2007)

    ...In Scully v. The Director of Public Prosecutions [2005] 1 I.R. the Supreme Court (Murray C.J., McGuinness and Hardiman JJ) considered that an apparent elapse of time of two years would be sufficient to justify that court in declining to entertain an application for judicial review in ...

  • D.P.P. -v- Byrne, [2001] IESC 97 (2001)

    THE SUPREME COURT. Record No: 226/00. Keane, C.J. Murray, J. Fennelly, J. IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 16 OF THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT 1947 . AND IN THE MATTER OF A CASE STATED IN RELATION TO A PROSECUTION ENTITLED. BETWEENTHE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC ...

  • Borges -v- Fitness to Practice Committee & ors, [2004] IESC 9 (2004)

    THE SUPREME COURT. Keane C.J. Murray J. McGuinness J. Hardiman J. McCracken J. 128/03. BETWEENSEBASTIAN BORGESAPPLICANT / RESPONDENTAND. THE FITNESS TO PRACTICE COMMITTEE OF THE MEDICAL COUNCIL AND THE MEDICAL COUNCILRESPONDENTS / ...

  • Lobe & ors -v- Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform, Osayande & anor -v- Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform and ors, [2003] IESC 3 (2003)

    JUDGMENT BY: McGuinness J. THE SUPREME COURT. Keane C.J. Denham J. Murray J. McGuinness J. Hardiman J. Geoghegan J. Fennelly J. 109/02 & 108/02. BETWEEN. DAVID LOBE, JANA LOVEOVA, ALADAR LOBE (A MINOR SUING BY HIS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, DAVID LOBE), LUKAS LOBE (A MINOR ...

  • C.S. -v- Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform & ors, [2004] IESC 44 (2004)

    THE SUPREME COURT. APPEAL NO. 2003/413. Murray C.J. McGuinness J. Hardiman J. Geoghegan J. Fennelly J. BETWEEN:. C.S., B.S. (A MINOR SUING BY HIS MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND C.S.) AND N.K. (A MINOR SUING BY HER MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND C.S.). ...