dpp v murray

1 result for dpp v murray

  • vLex Rating
  • C.S. -v- Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform & ors, [2004] IESC 44 (2004)

    THE SUPREME COURT. APPEAL NO. 2003/413. Murray C.J. McGuinness J. Hardiman J. Geoghegan J. Fennelly J. BETWEEN:. C.S., B.S. (A MINOR SUING BY HIS MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND C.S.) AND N.K. (A MINOR SUING BY HER MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND C.S.). ...

  • DPP -v- Una Black, [2009] IECCA 91

    ...222/2008. McCarthy J. O'Keeffe J. BETWEEN. THE PEOPLE AT THE SUIT OF . THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS-v-. UNA BLACKAPPLICANTJUDGMENT of the Court delivered by Murray C.J. on the 31st day of July 2009. On the 26th day of May 2008 at the Central Criminal Court the applicant pleaded guilty to the manslaughter of Mr. John Malone at Walter Macken Flats, Galway. The ...

  • Mahon -v- Post Publications, [2007] IESC 15 (2007)

    JUDGMENT BY: Fennelly J. THE SUPREME COURT . Record No. 367/05. Murray C.J. Denham J. Hardiman J. Geoghegan J. Fennelly J. BETWEEN/. HIS HONOUR JUDGE ALAN P. MAHON,. HER HONOUR JUDGE MARY FAHERTY. AND HIS HONOUR JUDGE GERALD B. KEYS. (MEMBERS OF THE TRIBUNAL OF INQUIRY. ...

  • O'Neill & anor -v- Governor of Castlerea Prison & ors, [2004] IESC 7 (2004)

    THE SUPREME COURT. Keane C.J. Denham J. Murray J. McGuinness J. McCracken J. 186/03. BETWEENMICHAEL O'NEILL & JOHN QUINNAPPELLANTS / APPLICANTSAND. THE GOVERNOR OF CASTLEREA PRISON, THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE, EQUALITY & LAW REFORM AND THE ...

  • D.S. -v- Judges of The Circuit Court & anor, [2008] IESC 37 (2008)

    ...There was no final verdict in the previous trials. The principle was recently described in Registrar of Companies v. Anderson [2005] 1 I.R. 21 at p.26, where Murray C.J. stated:-. "It has for a long time been a principle of the common law that a person cannot be prosecuted and punished for an offence of which he has already been acquitted or convicted. This is ...

  • D.S. -v- Judges of The Circuit Court & anor, [2008] IESC 37 (2008)

    ...There was no final verdict in the previous trials. The principle was recently described in Registrar of Companies v. Anderson [2005] 1 I.R. 21 at p.26, where Murray C.J. stated:-. "It has for a long time been a principle of the common law that a person cannot be prosecuted and punished for an offence of which he has already been acquitted or convicted. This is ...

  • The Attorney General v P.O.C, [2005] IEHC 289 (2005)

    ...The present complainant says that he then decided to contact the Maricopa County Attorney about "what happened to me". The extradition case. In A.G. v. Parke (Unreported, 6th December, 2004) Murray C.J. made the following observations (p. 8) in relation to the extradition process in this country:-"The role of the trial judge in an application for an order of extradition is unique. The hearing ...

  • Woori Bank & Anor v KDB Ireland Limited, [2005] IEHC 451 (2005)

    ...In this connection the Court's attention was drawn to the decision of the High Court of Northern Ireland in Downey v. Murray [1988] N.I. 600, where at p. 602 Carlswell J (as he then was) said:"It is necessary for the party opposing production to prove that the dominant purpose for which the document was brought into ...

  • McCarthy & anor -v- Garda Siochana Complaints Tribunal & ors, [2002] IESC 18 (2002)

    JUDGMENT BY: Murray J. THE SUPREME COURT. Record No: 258/98 Keane C.J. Murphy J. Murray J. McGuinness J. Geoghegan J. BETWEENCHRISTOPHER McCARTHY and JOHN DENNEDY. APPLICANTS/APPELLANTS. and. THE GARDA SÍOCHÁNA ...

  • Carmody -v- The Minister for Justice Equality & Law Reform & Ors, [2005] IEHC 10 (2005)

    ...Luedicke, Belkacem and Koc v. Germany - Judgment 28 November, 1978. 16. Maxwell v. United Kingdom [1994] 19 E.H.R.R. 97. 17. Monnell and Morris v. United Kingdom [1987] 10 E.H.R.R. 205. 18. Murray v. United Kingdom [1996] 22 E.H.R.R. 29. 19. McGee v. United Kingdom [2000] E.C.H.R. 28135/95. 20. Neumeister [1968] E.C.H.R. 1936/63; [1979-1980] 1 E.H.R.R. 91. 21. Pakelli v. Germany [1983] 6 ...

  • O Neill -v- Judge Patrick McCartan, [2007] IEHC 83 (2007)

    ...At p. 378 Murray J. held as follows:-"In criminal proceedings the onus is on the prosecution to establish beyond reasonable doubt that a defendant, while held in custody, has at all times been so held in accordance ...

  • Adams -v- D.P.P., [2001] IESC 27 (2001)

    THE SUPREME COURT. Record No. 116/00. Murray, J. McGuinness, J. Geoghegan, J. BETWEEN. JOHN ADAMS. APPELLANT/APPLICANT. AND. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS, JUDGE FOR DISTRICT NO. 16 AND HER MAJESTY'S SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HOME AFFAIRS. ...

  • Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform v McGrath, [2005] IEHC 116 (2005)

    ...Parke, (Unreported) 6th December, 2004, and in particular the judgments of Murray C.J., and Denham, J. As Murray, C.J., pointed out, the enquiry is not of an adversarial nature, but rather is in the nature of a sui generis enquiry. At page 11, he stated:"… I should first of all ...

  • Shanaghan & Ors -v- P J carroll & Ors, [2007] IEHC 229 (2007)

    ...As regards the work done, I am satisfied to accept the submission made by Mr. Murray, counsel for the first named defendant, that no satisfactory explanation is offered as to why a plenary summons was not issued for over one year following consultation with the plaintiff or why, ...

  • Ryanair -v- The Labour Court, [2007] IESC 6 (2007)

    JUDGMENT BY: Fennelly J. THE SUPREME COURT . Appeal No. 377/2005. Murray C.J. Denham J. Hardiman J. Geoghegan J. Fennelly J. BETWEEN:. RYANAIR LIMITED. Applicant/Appellant. and . THE LABOUR COURT . Respondent and . IRISH MUNICIPAL PUBLIC AND CIVIL . TRADE UNION (IMPACT) ...

  • DPP -v- Gordon Ryan, [2009] IECCA 21

    ... of section 99 of the Criminal Justice Act 2006 the application to reactivate was governed by common law and having regard to the decision in The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v Alan Murray, unreported, Court of Criminal Appeal 18th March 2003 the court's discretion was limited to revoking the suspension or refusing to revoke it. The learned trial judge held that he was bound by the ...

  • H. -v- His Honour Judge Groarke, [2002] IESC 63 (2002)

    THE SUPREME COURT. Keane C.J. Murphy J. Murray J. Geoghegan J. Fennelly J. 153/01. BETWEEN:. D.H. APPLICANT. AND. HIS HONOUR JUDGE RAYMOND GROARKE AND THE DIRECTOR . OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS. RESPONDENTS. AND . THE NORTH EASTERN HEALTH BOARD AND ...

  • DPP -v- Timothy Kavanagh, [2009] IECCA 29

    ...14. The issue raised at trial was this: in essence, Mr. Reddin said that he had been asked to go in and speak to the appellant by Inspector Pat Murray. His evidence was that he and his wife had gone to the Garda station to see their daughter. They were treated courteously. His evidence continued as follows:-"I was in there about five minutes, and ...

  • Bemis v Minister for Arts Heritage Gaeltacht and The Islands & Ors, [2005] IEHC 207 (2005)

    ...Otherwise the exercise of the power will be held to be invalid for being ultra vires." In the case of Dunnes Stores Ireland Company v. Ryan at p. 89 of the report, Murray J. (as he then was) held that:- "… in exercising her powers under s. 19, the second respondent [the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment], without intending to be exhaustive as to all the ...

  • Director of Public Prosecutions -v- Diver, [2005] IESC 57 (2005)

    THE SUPREME COURT. Murray C.J., 161/02. Denham J. Hardiman J. Fennelly J. McCracken J. Between:. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS. Prosecutor/Respondent. v. JOHN DIVER. Appellant. JUDGMENT of Mr. Justice Hardiman delivered ...

  • Brennan -v- Judge Windle & ors, [2003] IESC 48 (2003)

    ...It is unnecessary in the circumstances to make any order in relation to the reissued warrant. Jh130. JUDGMENT BY: Geoghegan J. THE SUPREME COURT Murray J. Hardiman J. Geoghegan J. 353/02. BETWEEN/. EDWARD BRENNAN. Applicant. and. JUDGE DESMOND WINDLE, JUDGE CATHERINE. MURPHY, THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS, IRELAND AND. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. ...

  • Foley v Judge Catherine Murphy & Anor, [2005] IEHC 332 (2005)

    ...in the case of Murray v. Linnane unreported, High Court, July 31st, 2002, in which he stated as follows:"This court is concerned with the decision making process and not the correctness and point of law of the decision ...

  • Kennedy -v- Law Society, [2001] IESC 35 (2001)

    JUDGMENT BY: Murphy J. Record No: 312/1999. Murphy J. Murray J. McGuinness J. Hardiman J. Fennelly J. Giles J Kennedy. Applicant/ Appellant. AND. The Law Society of Ireland, Patrick Joseph Connolly and . Aishling Foley. Respondents. Judgment of Mr Justice ...

  • Dowling -v- Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform, [2003] IESC 33 (2003)

    JUDGMENT BY: Fennelly J. THE SUPREME COURT. 340/02. Murray J. McGuinness J. Fennelly J. DOWLING. Appellant. v . MINISTER FOR JUSTICE, EQUALITY AND LAW REFORM . Respondent. JUDGMENT of Fennelly J. delivered on the 22nd day of May, 2003. The Appellant, Glen ...

  • Adams & ors -v- Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform & ors, [2001] IESC 38 (2001)