dpp v murray

389 results for dpp v murray

  • vLex Rating
  • Rattigan -v- DPP, [2008] IESC 34 (2008)

    JUDGMENT BY: Murray C.J. AND. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS. RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT. JUDGMENT of Murray C.J. delivered the 7th day of May 2008. I agree with the conclusions of Geoghegan J. for the reasons set out ...

  • Redmond -v- Ireland & Anor, [2009] IEHC 201 (2009)

    ...The Supreme Court held against the accused. There were two judgments delivered, one by Geoghegan J. (with whom Murray C.J., Denham J. and Kearns J. agreed) and the other by Fennelly J. who also held against the applicant. Geoghegan J. emphasised that it was important to note that the court "is not concerned with any ...

  • Redmond -v- Ireland & Anor, [2009] IEHC 201 (2009)

    ...The Supreme Court held against the accused. There were two judgments delivered, one by Geoghegan J. (with whom Murray C.J., Denham J. and Kearns J. agreed) and the other by Fennelly J. who also held against the applicant. Geoghegan J. emphasised that it was important to note that the court "is not concerned with any ...

  • Redmond -v- Ireland & Anor, [2009] IEHC 201 (2009)

    ...The Supreme Court held against the accused. There were two judgments delivered, one by Geoghegan J. (with whom Murray C.J., Denham J. and Kearns J. agreed) and the other by Fennelly J. who also held against the applicant. Geoghegan J. emphasised that it was important to note that the court "is not concerned with any ...

  • DPP -v- Independent Newspapers, [2009] IESC 20 (2009)

    THE SUPREME COURT. 221/05 . Murray C.J. . Hardiman J. . Geoghegan J. Fennelly J. Finnegan J. IN THE MATTER OF A CONTEMPT OF COURT. and . IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION PURSUANT TO ORDER 44 Between:. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC ...

  • DPP v Ian Ebbs, [2011] IECCA 5 (2011)

    ...12 The decision in Cugullere can be seen as a routine application of the principle applied in this jurisdiction in The People v. Murray [1977] I.R. 360, which involved the question whether on a charge of capital murder, where the mens rea for murder had been established, it was nevertheless necessary to prove mens rea in respect of ...

  • D.P.P.-v- Owen Reid & Christopher Kirwan, [2004] IECCA 3 (2004)

    ...George's Church, where, apparently, a crowd coming out of that building had become disorderly. It appears that as a number of gardaí, including a Garda Murray, approached the disorderly group, his attention was drawn to another and separate group which had become disorderly and apparently included the accused Mr. Kirwan. A Garda Benson alleged that this ...

  • DPP -v- Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Limited & ors, [2008] IESC 8 (2008)

    THE SUPREME COURT. JUDICIAL REVIEW[221/05]. Murray C.J. Hardiman J. . Geoghegan J. Fennelly J. Finnegan J. Between. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONSApplicant/AppellantAND. INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS (IRELAND) LIMITED AND ORS.Respondents. JUDGMENT of ...

  • Ludlow -v- DPP, [2008] IESC 54 (2008)

    JUDGMENT BY: Denham J. THE SUPREME COURT. [S.C. No. 311 of 2005]. Murray C.J. Denham J. . Hardiman J. . Between/. Denis Ludlow. Applicant/Respondent . and. The Director of Public Prosecutions. Respondent/Appellant. Judgment delivered the 31st day of July, 2008 by Denham ...

  • DPP -v- Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Limited & ors, [2008] IESC 8 (2008)

    THE SUPREME COURT. Judicial Review221/05. Murray C.J. Hardiman J. . Geoghegan J. Fennelly J. Finnegan J. Between:. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONSApplicant/Appellantand. INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS (IRELAND) LIMITED and Ors.Respondents. JUDGMENT of ...

  • DPP -v- Independent Newspapers, [2009] IESC 20 (2009)

    THE SUPREME COURT. 221/05 . Murray C.J. . Hardiman J. . Geoghegan J. Fennelly J. Finnegan J. IN THE MATTER OF A CONTEMPT OF COURT. and . IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION PURSUANT TO ORDER 44 Between:. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC ...

  • D.P.P.-v- Adam Keane, [2007] IECCA 119 (2007)

    ...Irvine J. IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 2 OF THE CRIMINAL. JUSTICE ACT 1993 . BETWEEN. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS. APPLICANT. -v-. ADAM KEANERESPONDENTJUDGMENT of the Court delivered by Murray C.J. on the 19th day of December 2007. This is an application by the Director of Public Prosecutions pursuant to s. 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1993 for a review of the sentence imposed on the ...

  • D.P.P.-v- Adam Keane, [2007] IECCA 119 (2007)

    ...Irvine J. IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 2 OF THE CRIMINAL. JUSTICE ACT 1993 . BETWEEN. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS. APPLICANT. -v-. ADAM KEANERESPONDENTJUDGMENT of the Court delivered by Murray C.J. on the 19th day of December 2007. This is an application by the Director of Public Prosecutions pursuant to s. 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1993 for a review of the sentence imposed on the ...

  • DPP -v- McKevitt, [2009] IESC 29 (2009)

    THE SUPREME COURT. Murray C.J. 467/06. Denham J. Hardiman J. Geoghegan J. Fennelly J. BETWEEN. THE PEOPLE AT THE SUIT OF . THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS. RESPONDENT. -v-. MICHAEL McKEVITT APPELLANT RULING of the Court ...

  • DPP v Darragh Small, [2011] IECCA 4 (2011)

    ...[Transcript, 05 November, 2009, p.10, line 6 to 30]. 16. The letter was read out by the learned trial judge also, in her charge to the jury. 17. Mr. David Murray, a defence witness, gave evidence. This included his view that the key found at the scene was compatible with being a Renault key. Decision. 18. The Court is satisfied that in all the circumstances ...

  • Oates -v- Judge Browne & Anor, [2010] IEHC 381 (2010)

    ...In so deciding an application to inspect a machine, McKechnie J. held that the court must apply fair procedures. In the course of the Supreme Court judgment, at p. 411, Murray C.J., giving the sole judgment of the Supreme Court said:-. “In addition . . . there is one further safeguard which I consider of particular relevance. It is the entitlement of an accused person to ...

  • DPP -v- Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Limited & ors, [2008] IESC 8 (2008)

    THE SUPREME COURT 221/05. Murray C.J. Hardiman J. Geoghegan J. Fennelly J. Finnegan J. IN THE MATTER OF A CONTEMPT OF COURT AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION PURSUANT TO ORDER 44. BETWEEN/. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC ...

  • McFarlane -v- DPP, [2008] IESC 7 (2008)

    ...The jurisdiction in this respect is triggered by the fact, if it can be established, that there has been blameworthy prosecutorial delay. At p.185 of the judgment (with which Murray C.J., Denham J., Hardiman J. and Geoghegan J. agreed) I stated:- "I believe that the balancing exercise referred to by Keane C.J. in P.M. v Malone [2002] 2 I.R. 560 is the appropriate mechanism to be ...

  • DPP -v- Una Black, [2009] IECCA 91 (2009)

    ...222/2008. McCarthy J. O'Keeffe J. BETWEEN. THE PEOPLE AT THE SUIT OF . THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS-v-. UNA BLACKAPPLICANTJUDGMENT of the Court delivered by Murray C.J. on the 31st day of July 2009. On the 26th day of May 2008 at the Central Criminal Court the applicant pleaded guilty to the manslaughter of Mr. John Malone at Walter Macken Flats, Galway. The ...

  • DPP -v- Una Black, [2009] IECCA 91 (2009)

    ...222/2008. McCarthy J. O'Keeffe J. BETWEEN. THE PEOPLE AT THE SUIT OF . THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS-v-. UNA BLACKAPPLICANTJUDGMENT of the Court delivered by Murray C.J. on the 31st day of July 2009. On the 26th day of May 2008 at the Central Criminal Court the applicant pleaded guilty to the manslaughter of Mr. John Malone at Walter Macken Flats, Galway. The ...

  • Ludlow -v- DPP, [2008] IESC 54 (2008)

    THE SUPREME COURT. Murray C.J. 311/05. Denham J. Hardiman J. DENIS LUDLOW. Applicant. and. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS and His HONOUR JUDGE MICHAEL O'SHEA. Appellant. JUDGMENT of Mr. Justice Hardiman delivered on the ...

  • Eviston -v- Director of Public Prosecutions, [2002] IESC 62 (2002)

    ...A statement of opposition was filed on behalf of the respondent, grounded on an affidavit of Donal Murray, an officer in the DPP's office. In that affidavit, Mr. Murray referred to the summary of the review procedure of the office of the DPP set out in his annual report. A further affidavit was filed by ...

  • C. [a minor] -v- D. P. P., [2008] IEHC 39 (2008)

    ...The test to be applied in considering whether or not to prohibit a trial was most recently stated in H. v Director of Public Prosecutions [2006] 3 I.R. stated by Murray C.J. to be as follows:-"The test to be applied by a court in such an application has been an evolving one. In B. v Director of Public Prosecutions [1997] 3 I.R. 140 the test was described by Denham ...

  • C. [a minor] -v- D. P. P., [2008] IEHC 39 (2008)

    ...The test to be applied in considering whether or not to prohibit a trial was most recently stated in H. v Director of Public Prosecutions [2006] 3 I.R. stated by Murray C.J. to be as follows:-"The test to be applied by a court in such an application has been an evolving one. In B. v Director of Public Prosecutions [1997] 3 I.R. 140 the test was described by Denham ...

  • DPP -v- McKevitt, [2009] IESC 29 (2009)

    THE SUPREME COURT. Murray C.J. 467/06. Denham J. Hardiman J. Geoghegan J. Fennelly J. BETWEEN. THE PEOPLE AT THE SUIT OF . THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS. RESPONDENT. -v-. MICHAEL McKEVITT APPELLANT RULING of the Court ...