Ashraf v The Minister for Justice and Equality
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judge | Mr Justice Max Barrett |
Judgment Date | 21 December 2018 |
Neutral Citation | [2018] IEHC 760 |
Docket Number | 2018 No. 338 JR |
Court | High Court |
Date | 21 December 2018 |
[2018] IEHC 760
THE HIGH COURT
Barrett J.
2018 No. 338 JR
and
Visa applications – Certiorari – Deficiencies – Applicants seeking orders of certiorari in respect of appeal decisions – Whether deficiencies presented as regards the applicants’ appeals
Facts: The first applicant, Mr Ashraf, a Pakistani resident in Pakistan, obtained a critical skills employment permit (CSEP) from the Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation (DBEI). Since receiving same, he, the second, third and fourth applicants, his wife and minor children, applied for long-stay visas which were refused by the respondent, the Minister for Justice and Equality. Failed appeals followed. The applicants sought, inter alia, orders of certiorari in respect of the appeal decisions.
Held by the High Court (Barrett J) that deficiencies presented in Mr Ashraf’s refusal on appeal which stated, inter alia, that he: (i) “has not provided a six month detailed bank statement”; (ii) “has not supplied any evidence of experience of working in a similar capacity”; and (iii) “may branch into the…UK”. Barrett J held that points (i) and (ii) showed that the respondent did not consider all the evidence before him and/or did not appreciate certain evidence for what it was; point (iii) was a further deficiency, though of a different nature. Barrett J held that he would therefore grant the order of certiorari that Mr Ashraf sought.
Barrett J held that, having noted that the first ground for refusing Ms Saleem’s appeal was that Mr Ashraf’s application failed and given the deficiencies presenting as regards Mr Ashraf’s appeal, an order of certiorari would follow for Ms Saleem. As to the children, Barrett J held that their appeals failed because their parents’ appeals failed, so an order of certiorari would also issue in respect of their appeals.
Application granted.
Mr Ashraf, a Pakistani gentleman resident in Pakistan, has obtained a critical skills employment permit (CSEP) from the Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation (DBEI). Since receiving same, he, his wife and minor children have applied for long-stay visas which have been refused by the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
S v Minister for Justice
...the work permit. 36 The applicant urged the court to follow the decision of Barrett J. in Asshas v Minister for Justice and Enterprise [2018] IEHC 760 where Barrett J. held that the work permit “is a form of evidence of experience”. This, according to the applicant, meant that the Minister ......
-
Yuliya Mukovska v The Minister for Justice
...in T.A.R. and I.H. v The Minister for Justice and Equality [2014] IEHC 385 (McDermott J.) and Ashraf v The Minister for Justice [2018] IEHC 760 (Barrett J.), and on the Court of Appeal judgments in Borta v The Minister for Justice and Equality [2019] IECA 255 (Donnelly J.), H.M. v The Minis......
-
Ahmed Abounar, Walaa Marey and Mohamed Abounar (A Minor Suing by His Father and Next Friend) Ahmed Abounar v The Minister for Justice and Equality
...impugned decision. 39 The applicant sought to argue that a High Court decision in the case of Ashraf v Minister for Justice & Equality [2018] IEHC 760 supported his approach and that, rather than following Akhtar, I should follow Ashraf. In this case, the applicant for a visa had submitted ......