Attorney General and the Minister for Posts and Telegraphs v Córas Iompair Éireann
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1956 |
| Date | 01 January 1956 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
(S.C.),
Attorney General and the Minister for Posts and Telegraphs
and
Coras Iompair Eireann
Payments made by Minister as a result of injury to servant -Claim by Attorney General and Minister on behalf of the People of Ireland against defendants for sums paid as a result of servant's injury - Right of Attorney General and Minister to sue on behalf of the People of Ireland - Whether the People of Ireland was a person or body of persons known to the law for the purpose of proceedings - Case stated.
M. was a postman...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Attorney General and Another v Ryan's Car Hire Ltd
...and Attorney-General v. O'BrienIR [1949] I.R,. 91 and Attorney-General and Minister for Posts and Telegraphs v. Coras Iompair EireannDLTR90 I.L.T.R. 139 not followed; Monmouthshire County Council v. SmithWLR [1956] 1 W.L.R. 1132 approved; 2, that an action per quod servitium amisit does not......
-
Byrne v Ireland
...of Mr. Justice Murnaghan was correct and this appeal should be dismissed. 1 [1927] I.R. 62. 2 [1939] I.R. 590. 3 [1949] I.R. 91. 4 (1951) 90 I.L.T.R. 139. 5 [1965] I.R. 642. 6 See pp. 285-6, 303-5. 7 See pp. 303-5, 8 [1950] I.R. 142. 9 [1962] I.R. 216. 10 [1966] I.R. 345. 11 [1962] I.R. 216......
-
State (Quinn) v Ryan
...(1) [1952] I. R. 62. (2) [1937] I. R. 699. (1) [1937] I. R. 699. (2) [1952] I. R. 62. (1) [1937] I. R. 699. (2) [1952] I. R. 62. (3) 90 I. L. T. R. 139. (4) [1955] 2 Q. B. 377; [1955] 1 All E. R. (1) [1937] I. R. 699. (2) [1952] I. R. 62. (1) [1937] I. R. 699. (2) [1931] I. R. 39. (1) [1931......
-
People (Attorney General) v McGlynn
...JJ. 1 Now s. 429 of Income Tax Act, 1967. (2) [1963] I.R. 92. (3) [1954] I.R. 233. (4) [1942] I.R. 86. (5) [1954] I. R. 128. (6) 90 I. L. T. R. 139. (7) [1963] I.R. 420. (8) [1955] I.R. 119. (9) 91 I.L.T.R. 30. (10) 77 I.L.T.R. 195. (11) [1949] Ir. Jur. Rep. 53. (12) [1965] I.R. 642. (13) [......
Get Started for Free