Attorney General v Murray (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 15 July 1925 |
| Date | 15 July 1925 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Irish Free State) |
Supreme Court.
Practice - Appeal - Decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal - Certificate necessary to appeal therefrom - By what Court to be given - Whether by the Supreme Court or by the Court of Criminal Appeal - Courts of Justice Act, 1924 (No. 10 of 1924), sect. 29.
Application for a certificate to enable the applicant to appeal to the Supreme Court from a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal.
James Murray, the applicant, had been convicted at the Central Criminal Court on a charge of murder, and sentenced to death. The conviction and sentence were, on appeal, affirmed by the Court of Criminal Appeal, reported ante, p. 266. And the Court refused to grant the applicant a certificate under sect. 29 of the Courts of Justice Act, 1924, to enable him to appeal from their decision to the Supreme Court. Following that refusal by the Court of Criminal Appeal, the applicant now applied to the Supreme Court for a certificate, the point of law involved being whether, on the construction of the section, the Court to grant the certificate was the Supreme Court or the Court of Criminal Appeal.
Sect. 29...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
A.B. v Minister for Justice
...mentioned in this report:- Attorney General (Fahy) v. Bruen [1936] I.R. 750; (1936) 70 I.L.T.R. 247. Attorney-General v. Murray (No. 2) [1926] I.R. 300; (1925) 59 I.L.T.R. 112. Brady v. Donegal County Council [1989] I.L.R.M. 282. Hanafin v. Minister for the Environment [1996] 2 I.R. 321; [1......
-
IRISH ASPHALT Ltd v Bord Pleanála
...V CONMEY 1975 IR 341 LOCAL GOVT (PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT) ACT 1963 S82(3B)(b)(iii) COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT 1924 S29 AG V MURRAY (NO 2) 1926 IR 300 KSK ENTERPRISES LTD V BORD PLEANALA 1994 2 ILRM 1 HANAFIN V MIN ENVIRONMENT UNREP SUPREME 1.3.96 1996/5/1262 DILLON-LEETCH V CALLEARY UNREP SUPR......
-
B & S v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
...right of appeal to the Supreme Court. The court followed the reasoning of the former Supreme Court in Attorney General v. Murray (No. 2) [1926] I.R. 300. An unsuccessful attempt to reopen this issue was made in Irish Hardware Association v. South Dublin County Council, also cited above. But......
-
B (A) v Governor of Training Unit Glengarriff Parade Dublin
... ... both the grounds advanced in support of the proposition that there is no need for an extension of time, the alternative argument for an extension ... ...