Attorney General v Paperlink Ltd

JurisdictionIreland
CourtHigh Court
Judgment Date01 January 1984
Date01 January 1984
(H.C.)
Attorney General
and
Paperlink Ltd

Monopoly - Statutory monopoly in respect of the conveying of "letters" -Private courier service - Minister seeking an injunction - Whether defendant's trading in breach of the monopoly - Meaning of "letters" -Whether relevant provisions unconstitutional -Post Office Act, 1908 (c. 48), s. 34. Attorney General - Company operating in breach of a statutory monopoly - Attorney General, acting as guardian of public rights, seeking an injunction - Whether proceedings misconceived. Constitution - Statutory monopoly in respect of the conveying of "letters" - Whether violative of personal and property rights - Right to communicate - Right to earn a livelihood - Whether such a right a personal or a property right -Whether infringed - Interpretation - Purposive or literal approach - Whether court precluded from considering the principles of social policy -Onus of proof - Constitution of Ireland, 1937, Arts. 38, 40.3.1, 40.3.2, 45.3.1 - Post Office Act, 1908. Evidence - Challenge to the constitutionality of legislation conferring statutory monopoly on Post Office - Evidence as to the alleged inefficiency in the administration of the postal service - Whether admissible.

The Post Office Act, 1908, s. 34(2), as amended by the Ministers and Secretaries Act, 1924, gives the Minister for Posts...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
68 cases
  • Irish Times Ltd v Ireland
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 2 April 1998
    ...Attorney General for England and Wales v. Brandon Books Publishing Ltd.IR [1986] I.R. 597 considered. Attorney General v. PaperlinkDLRM [1984] ILRM 373 distinguished. 3. That the freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 40.6.1 of the Constitution included criticism of the government poli......
  • Freney v Freney
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 22 October 2008
    ...PERSON ACT 1997 S5 NON FATAL OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT 1997 S9 NON FATAL OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT 1997 S10 AG v PAPERLINK 1984 ILRM 373 O'CONNOR v WILLIAMS 2001 1 IR 248 1996 2 ILRM 382 1996/14/4287 POST OFFICE ACT 1908 ROAD TRAFFIC (PUBLIC SERVICE VEHICLE) REGS SI 191/1963 NEW......
  • Kenny (t/a Denture Express) v Dental Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 25 May 2004
    ...ACT 1985 S9(1) DENTISTS ACT 1985 S9(1)(F) DENTISTS ACT 1985 S9(2) DENTISTS ACT 1985 S15(1) DENTISTS ACT 1985 S15(2) AG v PAPERLINK 1984 ILRM 373 COMPETITION ACT 1991 S4(1) TREATY OF ROME ART 81 COMPETITION ACT 2002 S5(1) TREATY OF ROME ART 82 COMPETITION ACT 1991 S4DONOVAN & ORS v ESB & AN......
  • Parsons v Kavanagh
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1990
    ...AER 824 BETTING & LOTTERIES ACT 1934 LONRHO V SHELL PETROLEUM 1981 2 AER 456 RCA CORPORATION V POLLARD 1982 3 AER 771 AG V PAPERLINK LTD 1984 ILRM 373 MURTAGH PROPERTIES LTD V CLEARY 1972 IR 330 RYAN V AG 1965 IR 294 YEATES V MIN FOR POSTS & TELEGRAPHS UNREP HIGH 21.2.1978 1981/8/1406 MUR......
  • Get Started for Free
6 books & journal articles
  • An Audit of Fair Procedures within the GAA: The Impetus for Change of the GAA's Disciplinary Rules Provided by the Na Fianna Action
    • Ireland
    • Trinity College Law Review No. VII-2004, January 2004
    • 1 January 2004
    ...(1997) 5(3) Sport and Law Journal 5. 74 See, Murtagh Properties v. Cleary [1972] IR 330, Murphy v. Stewart [1973] IR 97, AG v. Paperlink [1984] ILRM 373, In Re Article 26 and the Employment Equality Bill, 1996 [1997] 2 IR 321. The right to earn a livelihood has been classified as an unenume......
  • Does Expression Have Any Freedom Left? Murphy v. Independent Radio and Television Commission
    • Ireland
    • Trinity College Law Review No. I-1998, January 1998
    • 1 January 1998
    ...of law, form and fact, would like to acknowledge his assistance. 1 (1943) 52 F Supp 362, 372. 2 Attorney General v. Paperlink Ltd. [1984] ILRM 373; Kearney v. Minister for Justice [1987] ILRM 52; Oblique Financial Services Ltd. v. The Promise Production Co. Ltd. [1994] 1 ILRM 74; Carraigali......
  • Constitutional Rights and Covid-19: O'Doherty & Anor v Minister for Health & Ors [2020] IEHC 209
    • Ireland
    • Cork Online Law Review No. 20-2021, January 2021
    • 1 January 2021
    ...Corporation [1998] IESC 26 [16]. 51 Ryan v Attorney General [1965] IESC 1, [1965] IR 294. 52 Attorney General v Paperlink [1983] IEHC 1, [1984] ILRM 373. 53 Brendan Glynn, ‘COVID-19: The Constitutionality of the Emergency Legislation in Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak’ [2020] 38(14) Irish......
  • Regulating Religious Function: The Strange Case of Mass Cards
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 9-2010, January 2010
    • 1 January 2010
    ...observe distinctions on religious grounds where necessary to ensure the free practice of religion. 122 Attorney General v Paperlink Ltd [1984] ILRM 373 [hereinafter Paperlink ]. 123 Ibid , p 385. 124 Kelly, in Litton (ed) The Constitution of Ireland, 1937–1987 (Dublin: Institute of Public A......
  • Get Started for Free