Attorney General v Paperlink Ltd

JurisdictionIreland
CourtHigh Court
Judgment Date01 January 1984
Date01 January 1984
(H.C.)
Attorney General
and
Paperlink Ltd

Monopoly - Statutory monopoly in respect of the conveying of "letters" -Private courier service - Minister seeking an injunction - Whether defendant's trading in breach of the monopoly - Meaning of "letters" -Whether relevant provisions unconstitutional -Post Office Act, 1908 (c. 48), s. 34. Attorney General - Company operating in breach of a statutory monopoly - Attorney General, acting as guardian of public rights, seeking an injunction - Whether proceedings misconceived. Constitution - Statutory monopoly in respect of the conveying of "letters" - Whether violative of personal and property rights - Right to communicate - Right to earn a livelihood - Whether such a right a personal or a property right -Whether infringed - Interpretation - Purposive or literal approach - Whether court precluded from considering the principles of social policy -Onus of proof - Constitution of Ireland, 1937, Arts. 38, 40.3.1, 40.3.2, 45.3.1 - Post Office Act, 1908. Evidence - Challenge to the constitutionality of legislation conferring statutory monopoly on Post Office - Evidence as to the alleged inefficiency in the administration of the postal service - Whether admissible.

The Post Office Act, 1908, s. 34(2), as amended by the Ministers and Secretaries Act, 1924, gives the Minister for Posts and Telegraphs a monopoly of conveying letters and of providing related services. The defendants, a company and its directors, began to operate a courier service in Dublin in 1981. The plaintiffs sought a declaration and injunction in support of the state postal monopoly, which they contended had been breached by the defendants. The Attorney General sued as guardian of public rights. The defendants denied that they were engaged in conveying letters; alleged that their operation was a private messenger service permissible under the 1908 Act; and contested the right of the Attorney General to seek an injunction when the Act provided a summary criminal remedy. In a counterclaim the 2nd, 3rd and 4th-named defendants, the directors currently holding office, asserted that the 1908 Act was unconstitutional because it infringed the right of citizens to communicate freely (an alleged personal right due for protection under Article 40.3.1 or Article 40.6.1), as well as their right to earn a livelihood (an alleged personal or property right). Held by Costello J., granting the injunction and declaration sought by the plaintiffs and dismissing the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
61 cases
  • Irish Times Ltd v Ireland
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 2 April 1998
    ...Attorney General for England and Wales v. Brandon Books Publishing Ltd.IR [1986] I.R. 597 considered. Attorney General v. PaperlinkDLRM [1984] ILRM 373 distinguished. 3. That the freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 40.6.1 of the Constitution included criticism of the government poli......
  • Freney v Freney
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 22 October 2008
    ...PERSON ACT 1997 S5 NON FATAL OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT 1997 S9 NON FATAL OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT 1997 S10 AG v PAPERLINK 1984 ILRM 373 O'CONNOR v WILLIAMS 2001 1 IR 248 1996 2 ILRM 382 1996/14/4287 POST OFFICE ACT 1908 ROAD TRAFFIC (PUBLIC SERVICE VEHICLE) REGS SI 191/1963 NEW......
  • Parsons v Kavanagh
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1990
    ...AER 824 BETTING & LOTTERIES ACT 1934 LONRHO V SHELL PETROLEUM 1981 2 AER 456 RCA CORPORATION V POLLARD 1982 3 AER 771 AG V PAPERLINK LTD 1984 ILRM 373 MURTAGH PROPERTIES LTD V CLEARY 1972 IR 330 RYAN V AG 1965 IR 294 YEATES V MIN FOR POSTS & TELEGRAPHS UNREP HIGH 21.2.1978 1981/8/1406 MUR......
  • Incorporated Law Society of Ireland v Carroll
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1996
    ...Citations: SOLICITORS ACT 1954 S56(1) SOLICITORS (AMDT) ACT 1994 S64 SOLICITORS ACT 1954 S59 SOLICITORS ACT 1954 S59(1) AG V PAPERLINK 1984 ILRM 373 GOURIET V UPW 1978 AC 435 GOODMAN INTERNATIONAL LTD V HAMILTON 1992 2 IR 542 SOLICITORS ACT 1954 S77(1) MOORE V AG 1930 IR 471 SPUC V COOGAN......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Constitutional Rights and Covid-19: O'Doherty & Anor v Minister for Health & Ors [2020] IEHC 209
    • Ireland
    • Cork Online Law Review Nbr. 20-2021, January 2021
    • 1 January 2021
    ...Corporation [1998] IESC 26 [16]. 51 Ryan v Attorney General [1965] IESC 1, [1965] IR 294. 52 Attorney General v Paperlink [1983] IEHC 1, [1984] ILRM 373. 53 Brendan Glynn, ‘COVID-19: The Constitutionality of the Emergency Legislation in Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak’ [2020] 38(14) Irish......
  • Regulating Religious Function: The Strange Case of Mass Cards
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal Nbr. 9-2010, January 2010
    • 1 January 2010
    ...observe distinctions on religious grounds where necessary to ensure the free practice of religion. 122 Attorney General v Paperlink Ltd [1984] ILRM 373 [hereinafter Paperlink ]. 123 Ibid , p 385. 124 Kelly, in Litton (ed) The Constitution of Ireland, 1937–1987 (Dublin: Institute of Public A......
  • Does Expression Have Any Freedom Left? Murphy v. Independent Radio and Television Commission
    • Ireland
    • Trinity College Law Review Nbr. I-1998, January 1998
    • 1 January 1998
    ...of law, form and fact, would like to acknowledge his assistance. 1 (1943) 52 F Supp 362, 372. 2 Attorney General v. Paperlink Ltd. [1984] ILRM 373; Kearney v. Minister for Justice [1987] ILRM 52; Oblique Financial Services Ltd. v. The Promise Production Co. Ltd. [1994] 1 ILRM 74; Carraigali......
  • Constitutionalising the Tort of Defamation - Bunreacht na Heireann as a Framework for the Reform of Ireland's Libel Laws
    • Ireland
    • Trinity College Law Review Nbr. V-2002, January 2002
    • 1 January 2002
    ...above has thus been endorsed by the courts in a very similar context. 58 See the High Court judgement ofCostello J. inAG v. Paperlink [1984] ILRM 373. 59 See Murphy v. IRTC[1999] 1 IR 12. [Vol. 5 Trinity College Law Review character of Irish society in the 1930s. 6 0 There is no obvious jus......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT