Attorney General v Southern Industrial Trust Ltd and Another
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1960 |
Date | 01 January 1960 |
Court | Supreme Court |
Car subject to hire-purchase agreement - Car exported by owner - No licence for exportation - Balance of hire-purchase price due to hire-purchase company - Car the property of hire-purchase company - Proceedings by Attorney General upon information for condemnation of car - Whether proceedings criminal or civil -Customs (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1945, s. 5 (1).
S. purchased a motor car at the end of 1950. The transaction was financed by I. T. Ltd. a hire-purchase company, the amount advanced to S. being repayable by him by monthly instalments. Wishing to export it temporarily he joined the A.A. and obtained a Tripty que for...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Murphy v The Revenue Commissioners
... ... another was something for which he did not accept any ... Counsel for the applicants accepts the general principle that excludes judicial review where a ... Revenue Commissioners, Ireland and the Attorney General [2008] IEHC 397 , in that regard ... v. Southern Industrial Trust Limited & Simons [1957] ... ...
-
J. & J. HAIRE & COMPANY Ltd v MINISTER for HEALTH
...Mór Teo. v. Commissioner of Public Works (No. 3)[2000] 1 I.R. 6; [2000] 1 I.L.R.M. 401. Attorney General v. Southern Industrial Trust (1957) 94 I.L.T.R. 161. Blake v. The Attorney General [1982] I.R. 117; [1981] I.L.R.M. 34. Brennan v. Attorney General [1983] I.L.R.M. 449. Buckley and Other......
-
Dellway Investment Ltd and Others v National Asset Mangagement Agency (NAMA) and Others
...459 US 400 AG & MIN FOR POSTS & TELEGRAPHS v PAPERLINK LTD & ORS 1984 ILRM 373 1983/7/1782 AG v SOUTHERN INDUSTRIAL TRUST LTD & SIMONS 1960 94 ILTR 161 CHESTVALE PROPERTIES LTD & HODDLE INVESTMENTS LTD v GLACKIN 1993 3 IR 35 1992 ILRM 221 1992/1/103 J & J HAIRE & CO LTD & ORS v MIN FOR HEAL......
-
O'B. v S
...ó laighléis [1960] I.R. 93. 18 In re N.S.M. (1971) 107 I.L.T.R. 1. 19 The Attorney General v. Southern Industrial Trust Ltd. (1957) 94 I.L.T.R. 161. 20 Buckley and Others (Sinn Féin) v. The Attorney General [1950] I.R. 67. 21 The State (Healy) v. Donoghue [1976] I.R. 325. 22 Blake v. The At......
-
Using Civil Processes in Pursuit of Criminal Law Objectives: A Case Study of Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture
...(No. 1) (1979–80) 1 EHRR 647.54 372 US 144 (1963).55 Campbell, ‘Theorising Asset Forfeiture in Ireland’, above n. 16 at 448.56 [1960] 94 ILTR 161.57 [1988] IR 326. 348 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF USING CIVIL PROCESSES IN PURSUIT OF CRIMINAL LAW OBJECTIVES demonstrate that ......