Attorney General v Sullivan
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 12 July 1964 |
| Date | 12 July 1964 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
Acts of preparation - Acts proximate to intended offences - Evidence - Form of charges - Particularity of alleged offences - Omission of statement that offences were contrary to statute or common law.
M.S. was a registered midwife, employed by the Cork Corporation under an agreement between her and the South Cork Board of Public Assistance, whereby she contracted to provide midwifery services, which the Board was under a statutory obligation to provide in certain cases. Her basic salary was £208 per annum and she was entitled to £4 4s. 0d. for every case attended by her for the Board in any year in excess of twenty-five cases; until this latter figure was reached no fees were payable to her. M.S. was charged in the District Court on three summonses with unlawfully attempting to obtain money by false pretences with intent to defraud. On the hearing of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
DPP v Ryan
...Finlay C.J. Lynch J. Barr J. 3/1986 DPP v. RYAN THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS v. WILLIAM ANTHONY RYAN Citations: AG V SULLIVAN 1964 IR 169 LONDON & GLOBE FINANCE CORPORATION LTD, IN RE 1903 1 CH 728 Synopsis: CRIMINAL LAW Fraud Attempt - Proof - Charge to jury - Accused convicted of a......