Bank of Ireland v Caffin
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 22 December 1971 |
| Date | 22 December 1971 |
| Docket Number | [1971. No. 64 Sp.] |
| Court | High Court |
Bank of Ireland
and
Caffin
Dissolution - Husband and wife domiciled in England - Marriage dissolved by order of English court - Husband remarrying in Ireland - Death of husband leaving both wives surviving - Whether second wife was the "spouse" of husband - Succession Act, 1965 (No. 27 of 1965), s. 111, sub-s. 1 - Constitution of Ireland, 1937, Articles 41, 50.
Section 111, sub.s. 1. of the Succession Act, 1965, provides that, if a testator leaves a spouse and no children, the spouse of the testator shall have a right to one half of his estate. The deceased had married the second defendant in England. In the month of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
17 cases
-
MEC v JAC (Divorce: Recognition)
...jurisdiction to legislate. Cases mentioned in this report:- Armitage v. The Attorney General [1906] P. 135. Bank of Ireland v. Caffin [1971] I.R. 123. K.D. (otherwise C.) v. M.C. [1985] I.R. 697; [1987] I.L.R.M. 189. K.E.D. v. M.C. (Unreported, High Court, Carroll J., 26th September, 1984).......
-
M.H. v G.H.
...divorce. This issue was considered in a number of cases notably, Mayo-Perrott v. Mayo-Perrott [1958] I.R. 336, Bank of Ireland v. Caffin [1971] I.R. 123, and Gaffney v. Gaffney [1975] I.R. 133. A passage from the judgment of Walsh J. in the case of Gaffney v. Gaffney at page 150 illustrates......
-
Clancy v Min Social Welfare
...FIN 488 M (C) V M (T) 1991 ILRM 268 GAFFNEY V GAFFNEY 1975 IR 133 K D (ORSE C) V M C 1985 IR 697 T V T 1983 IR 29 BANK OF IRELAND V CAFFIN 1971 IR 123 M T T V N T T 1982 ILRM 217 C (K) V C (M) 1985 IR 697 M (C) V M (T) 1988 ILRM 456 ARMITAGE V AG 1966 P 135 ADAMS DECEASED , IN RE 1967 IR 42......
-
W v C
... ... granted by the Superior Court of Arizona on 2 March 2021 is entitled to recognition in Ireland’s jurisdiction. The notice party, the Attorney General, identified four issues of systemic ... in Mayo-Perrott v. Mayo-Perrott [1958] IR 336 ; Kenny J. in Bank of Ireland v. Caffin [1971] 1 IR 123 ; Blayney J. in W v W [1993] 2 IR 476 and most ... ...
Get Started for Free