O'Brien v Minister for Defence, Ireland and Attorney General

JurisdictionIreland
CourtSupreme Court
JudgeHamilton C.J.
Judgment Date01 January 1998
Neutral Citation1998 WJSC-SC 11041
Judgment citation (vLex)[1997] 7 JIC 0702
Date01 January 1998
(S.C.)
(H.C.)
O'Brien
and
Minister for Defence, Ireland and the Attorney General

- Public interest - Diplomatic privilege - Statutory privilege - Defence Forces -Reports of UN and military inquiries into death of soldier in Lebanon - Power of Oireachtas to enact legislation conferring privilege of exemption from production on specified categories of documentary or other evidence - Defence Act, 1954 (No. 18) - Rules of Procedure (Defence Forces), 1954 (S.I. No. 243).

Rule 121 of the Rules of Procedure (Defence Forces), 1954, provides that the proceedings of a court of inquiry and any confession, statement or answer to any question made or given at a court of inquiry shall not be admissible against any person subject to military law, nor shall any evidence respecting the proceedings of a court of inquiry be given against any such person except upon his trial for committing the civil offence of perjury. Rule 122 provides that a finding of a court of inquiry shall not be admissible in evidence nor shall any question be asked of any witness in relation thereto. The plaintiff instituted proceedings arising out of the death of her husband from gunshot wounds suffered on 6 December, 1986, in the course of his duties as a member of the defence forces. The plaintiff alleged that the injuries which her husband sustained were the result of the negligence and breach of duty of the defendants. In 1991, the Master of the High Court made an order directing the defendants to make discovery on oath and it was provided that the affidavit be sworn by Anne O'Neill. The plaintiff was dissatisfied with the content and the manner in which the affidavits were drafted and brought a further motion in the High Court to direct the defendants to make further and better discovery of the documentation in their possession relating to the death of Private William O'Brien and to specify by enumeration each and every document with the general classification of privilege claimed in respect of each numbered document. The relief sought was refused by the High Court (see [1995] 1 I.R. 568 [1995] 1 ILRM 22) and the plaintiff ;appealed. While originally a United Nations inquiry report was sought, it was conceded by the plaintiff that such documentation is privileged. Attention then focused on the findings and report of the court of inquiry held in pursuance of the provisions of the Defence Act, 1954. It was submitted by the defendants that the documents were also privileged by virtue of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Edward Keating v Radio Telefís Éireann and Others
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 9 May 2013
    ...v Independent Newspapers and Anor [1988] IR 132; Skeffington v Rooney & Anor [1997] 1 IR 22; O'Brien v Minister for Defence & Ors [1998] 2 ILRM 156; In re Kevin O'Kelly [1974] 108 ILT 97; Burke & Ors v Central Independent Television plc [1994] 2 IR.61; Stafford v Revenue Commissioners (......
  • Ryanair Ltd v Channel 4 Television Corporation
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 5 October 2017
    ...the court to evaluate the claim. Generalised, non-specific details will not suffice: O'Brien v. Minister for Defence & Ors. [1998] 2 I.L.R.M. 156 at p. 159. In the vast majority of cases, it is only via this procedure that the privilege issue will be determined.' 30 In addition, Ryanair re......
  • Miggin (A Minor) v Health Service Executive (HSE) & Gannon
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 26 March 2010
    ...Newspapers (Ireland) Ltd. v. Murphy[2006] IEHC 276, [2006] 3 I.R. 566. O'Brien v. Ireland [1995] 1 I.R. 568; [1995] 1 I.L.R.M. 22; [1998] 2 I.L.R.M. 156. P.J. Carroll & Co. Ltd. v. Minister for Health and Children (No. 3) [2006] IESC 36, [2006] 3 I.R. 431. In re R. Ltd. [1989] I.R. 126; [19......
  • Brophy v Mediahuis Ireland Group Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 16 December 2022
    ...so as to permit the court to evaluate the claim. Generalised, non-specific details will not suffice: O'Brien v Minister for Defence [1998] 2 I.L.R.M. 156 at 159. In the vast majority of cases, it is only via this procedure that the privilege issue will be determined. That being said however......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT