Brown v Norton
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 17 December 1954 |
| Date | 17 December 1954 |
| Court | High Court |
Brown
and
Norton
Implied condition - House in course of erection Completed house - Evidence - Sale by way of sub - lease - Implied covenants on sale of house in course of erection -Covenant by purchaser that he has inspected the building and is satisfied therewith - Effect of covenant.
Where there is an agreement to purchase a house in the course of erection and it is clearly understood by the parties that the purchaser is contracting to buy, and the vendor is contracting to sell, a dwelling-house in which the purchaser can live as soon as it is completed by...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 cases
-
Siney v Corporation of Dublin
...on a long line of authorities illustrated by cases such as Sutton v. Temple 12M & W. 52, Hart v. Windsor 12 M. & W. 68, Brown v.Norton 1954 I.R. 34, Chambers v. Cork Corporation 93I.L.T.R.45, which established the proposition that the mere letting of land, with or without an unfurnished dwe......
-
Riordan v Carroll
...LIABILITY OF BUILDERS VENDORS & LESSORS (NO 1) 1977 CHAMBERS V CORK CORPORATION 93 ILTR 45 DEALE ON LANDLORD & TENANT 214 BROWNE V NORTON 1954 IR 34 SUPREME COURT PRACTICE 1988 (WHITE BOOK) 59/10/7 DEASYS ACT 1960 S14 LANDLORD & TENANT (IRL) ACT 1860 S13 LANDLORD & TENANT (IRL) ACT 1860 S......
-
Norta Wallpapers v John Sisk Ltd
...v. Midland Railway Co. (1869) L.R. 4 Q.B. 379. 4 G. H. Myers & Co. v. Brent Cross Service Co. [1934] 1 K.B. 46. 5 Brown v. Norton [1954] I.R. 34. 6 Cehave N. V. v. Bremer Handelsgesellschaft m.b.H. [1976] Q.B. 44. Case Stated. A special Case was stated pursuant to s. 35 of the Arbitration A......
-
O'Donnell v Ryan
...from noise, invasion of privacy, or otherwise is not enough.’ 79 The plaintiff relies on the judgment of Davitt P. in Brown v. Norton [1954] I.R. 34, wherein he states that there is no rule of law ‘on the mere sale or letting of an unfurnished but completely built house’ that precludes the ......
Get Started for Free