Bula Ltd v Tara Mines Ltd (No. 2)
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1988 |
Date | 01 January 1988 |
Docket Number | [1986 No. 10898P] |
Court | High Court |
Action for unlawful interference with economic interests - Mandatory interlocutory injunction sought - Whether grant of such relief dependent on plaintiff's prospects of success at trial of action - Whether terms of injunction sought certain enough to enable court to ensure compliance with its order - Whether grant of relief would prejudge one of the issues in the case.
The first plaintiff and the first defendant owned adjoining orebodies in Nevinstown, County Meath. The first defendant's orebody was held under a State mining lease granted in 1975 and made with amongst other persons the defendant Minister's predecessor-in-title. One of the provisions of that lease, clause f., provided that the lessee, the first defendant, undertook to co-operate with the lessor so as to ensure that the minerals thereby demised and any privately owned minerals in Nevinstown would be exploited in the most efficient and most economical manner with consequent benefit to all concerned and also provided that the lessee undertook to act reasonably in all negotiations to achieve such end. The lease further provided that should any dispute arise between the lessor and lessee concerning, inter alia, clause f. or as to...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
T.D. and Others v Minister for Education
...MIN FOR EDUCATION 1995 1 IR 409 G (D) V EASTERN HEALTH BOARD 1997 3 IR 511 B (D) V MIN FOR EDUCATION 1999 1 IR 29 BULA LTD V TARA MINES 1987 IR 95 CHILDRENS ACT 1908 S54(8) DUGGAN V AN TAOISEACH 1989 ILRM 710 CAHILL V SUTTON 1980 IR 269 CONSTITUTION ART 6 CONSTITUTION ART 40.3.1 QUINN......
-
Beades v European Banking Authority
...against whom it is granted ought to know exactly what he has to do." This statement was quoted with approval by Murphy J. in Bula Limited v. Tara Mines (No. 2) [ [1987] IR 95, 104] in which he refused to grant mandatory interlocutory injunctions inter alia, because in his opinion, if grant......
-
P v B
...certainty. Cases mentioned in this report:— Re A. (Minors) (Abduction: Acquiescence) [1992] 2 F.L.R. 14. Bula Ltd. v. Tara Mines Ltd. [1987] I.R. 95; [1988] I.L.R.M. 157. Re C. (A Minor) (Abduction) [1989] 1 F.L.R. 403. Re G. (A Minor) (Abduction) [1989] 2 F.L.R. 475. Hay v. O'Grady [1992] ......
-
De Burca v Wicklow County Council
...S32(2) EEC DIR 91/156 ANNEX IIA EEC DIR 91/156 ANNEX IIB FISHENDEN V HIGGS & HILL LTD 1935 153 LT 128 BULA LTD V TARA MINES LTD (NO 2) 1987 IR 95 REDLAND BRICKS LTD V MORRIS 1970 AC 652 CAMPUS OIL LTD V MIN FOR INDUSTRY (NO 2) 1983 IR 88 KEANE EQUITY & THE LAW OF TRUSTS ICC BANK PLC V VE......