Burke v Judge Anderson & DPP
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judge | Ms. Justice Irvine |
| Judgment Date | 23 November 2010 |
| Neutral Citation | [2010] IEHC 452 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [2010] 11 JIC 2310 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 23 November 2010 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
O'Leary and Others v The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
...ILRM 465; Re Article 26 and the Matrimonial Homes Bill [1994] 1 IR 304; Rogers v Smith (Unrep, SC, 16/7/1970); RX v Minister for Justice [2010] IEHC 452, [2011] 1 ILRM 444; Marckx v Belgium (1979) 2 EHRR 33; Boughanemi v France (1996) 22 EHRR 228; GO (a minor) v Minister for Justice [2008] ......
-
A (X)(an Infant) and Others v Min for Justice and Others
...of his discretion under s. 3(11) of the Immigration Act 1999: see, e.g., U. v. Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (No.1) [2010] IEHC 452. 21 21. Fifth, the Minister's decision must always respect the essence and substance of the right of the married couple under Article 41. A dec......
-
O'Leary & Lemiere v Min for Justice
...values associated with family life. As I ventured to suggest in my own judgment in RX v. Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2010] IEHC 452, [2011] 1 I.L.R.M. 444, 456:- "....it cannot have been intended by the People in 1937 that the family contemplated by Article 41 should be c......
-
Nyhan v Judge David Riordan
...it seems to me that judicial review would in effect become a mere appeal on the merits. As Irvine J. remarked in Burke v. Judge Anderson [2010] IEHC 452: '[22.] An application for an order of certiorari cannot be used as a method to appeal decisions or rulings of a lower court or as a mean......