O'Byrne v Byrne
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | High Court (Irish Free State) |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1938 |
| Date | 01 January 1938 |
I.F.S.],
O'Byrne
and
Byrne
"Family" - Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1923 (No. 19 of 1923), s. 1 (h) -Tenant - Woman dying intestate - "Member of the tenant's family" - Residence with tenant at time of her death.
The niece of a tenant of controlled premises having left her family home and gone to stay with the tenant for some months prior to, and until, the death of the latter intestate, in order to act as her companion and nurse, but without showing any intention of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
Jordan and Another v O'Brien
...[1954] I. R. 183. (2) [1949] Ir. Jur. Rep. 17. (3) [1950] 2 K. B. 204. (4) [1940] Ir. Jur. Rep. 13. (5) [1939] Ir. Jur. Rep. 90. (6) 72 I. L. T. R. 65. (7) [1949] Ir. Jur. Rep. 18. (8) 143 L. T. 333. (1) [1954] I. R. (2) [1951] 1 K. B. 666, at p. 672. (3) 19 Beav. 580. (4) [1896] 1 I. R. 60......
-
Blake v Attorney General
...Clinch v. McKeogh [1964] Ir. Jur. Rep. 37. 24 Dowling v. Hannon [1964] I.R. 19. 25 Reid v. Hogan [1973] I.R. 305. 26 O'Byrne v. Byrne (1938) 72 I.L.T.R. 65. 27 Condon v. Minister for Labour [1981] I.R. 62. 28 Siney v. Corporation of Dublin [1980] I.R. 400. 29 McCombe v. Sheehan [1954] I.R. ......
