Carpenter v Kirby
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judge | Mr. Justice Barr |
Judgment Date | 29 January 1990 |
Neutral Citation | 1990 WJSC-HC 197 |
Docket Number | JR. 289/1989. |
Court | High Court |
Date | 29 January 1990 |
1990 WJSC-HC 197
THE HIGH COURT
(JUDICIAL REVIEW)
BETWEEN
AND
Citations:
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 1967 S8
DISTRICT COURT DISTRICTS (DUBLIN) (AMDT) ORDER 1982 SI 88/1982 ART 2(a)
Synopsis:
CRIMINAL LAW
Charge
Defect - Withdrawal - New charge - Propriety - District Court - First charge struck out by District Justice - Natural justice - Fair procedures - Same incident being the basis of each charge - Intention to have the defendant returned for trial on indictment - The order made by the respondent District Justice was valid - (1989/289 JR - Barr J. - 29/1/90) - [1990] ILRM 764
|Carpenter v. Kirby|
NATURAL JUSTICE
Fair procedures
District Court - Charge - Withdrawal - New charge - Propriety - First charge struck out by District Justice - Same incident being the basis of each charge - Intention to have the defendant returned for trial on indictment - (1989/289 JR - Barr J. - 29/1/90) - [1990] ILRM 764
|Carpenter v. Kirby|
Judgment of Mr. Justice Barrdelivered the 29th day of January, 1990.
On 2nd January, 1989 the applicant was charged with a firearms offence as set out in Blanchardstown charge sheet No. 118 in which the place where the offence is alleged to have been committed was stated to be "at Mulhuddard Dublin 15". It was not specifically stated that that place is in the Dublin Metropolitan District. The applicant was duly brought beforethe learned first respondent sitting as a Justice of the Dublin Metropolitan District and the matter was adjourned on several occasions. In due course instructions were obtained from the Director of Public Prosections who indicated that he was not willing to consent to the charge being dealt with summarily in the District Court save on a plea of guilty. The applicant did not wish to take that course and so he was remanded from time to time pending preparation and service of a "Book of Evidence". It appears that after the Book was prepared it was adverted to by the Director that the usual formula "in the Dublin Metropolitan District" had been omitted from charge sheet No. 118 and he decided that it would be unsafe to proceed with a complaint based on the charge sheet in question and that the better course would to be re-charge the applicant. Accordingly, when the matter was again before the court on 6th June, 1989 the perceived...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
DPP (At the Suit of Garda O'Connor) v District Judge Mangan and Alan Considine (notice party)
...APPLICANT AND DISTRICT JUDGE MANGAN RESPONDENT AND ALAN CONSIDINE NOTICE PARTY COURTS (NO 3) ACT 1986 CARPENTER v JUDGE KIRBY & DPP 1990 ILRM 764 1990/1/197 DPP v SHEERAN 1986 ILRM 579 1986/2/589 PETTY SESSIONS (IRL) ACT 1851 S10(4) KENNELLY v CRONIN 2002 4 IR 292 2003 1 ILRM 505 2002/1......
-
Shannon v McGuinness
...V SUTTON 1980 IR 269 LYNCH, STATE V COONEY 1982 IR 337 PROSECUTION OF OFFENCES ACT 1974 DCR r66 DCR r64(3) CARPENTER V KIRBY & ANOR 1990 ILRM 764 MCCORMACK, STATE V CURRAN 1987 ILRM 225 H V DPP 1994 2 IR 589 LANDERS V GARDA SIOCHANA COMPLAINTS BOARD UNREP KELLY 7.3.97 1 Judgment of Mr. J......
-
DPP v Ní Chondúin
...DPP v V NOLAN 1990 2 IR 526 SHANNON & SHANNON v DISTRICT JUDGE OLIVER MCGUINNESS & DPP 1999 3 IR 274 CARPENTER v DISTRICT JUDGE KIRBY 1990 ILRM 764 DCR 1948 r66 DCR 1997 O.23 r3 DPP v MARTIN & KELLY UNREP KINLEN 19.5.2000 2000 IEHC 52 WHELAN v JUDGE KIRBY & DPP 2004 2 ILRM 1 2004 49 1137......
-
G.S. v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána
...Power S.C. for the first, second, fifth and sixth respondents. Cur. adv. vult. Cases mentioned in this report:- Carpenter v. Kirby [1990] I.L.R.M. 764. Cox v. Ireland [1992] 2 I.R. 503. Gray v. Minister for Justice [2007] IEHC 52, [2007] 2 I.R. 654. Kennedy v. Ireland [1987] I.R. 587; [1988......