Central Dublin Development Association v Attorney General
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1975 |
| Date | 01 January 1975 |
| Court | High Court |
(H.C.)
Central Dublin Development Association
and
The Attorney General
Property rights -Compulsory acquisition - Pawers of planning authority - Limited judicial power - Development plan - Obsolete area - Local Government (Planning and Development) Act, 1963 (No. 28), ss. 2, 5, 19-22, 26, 28-30, 33, 35-37, 56-58, 69, 75, 77-79, 82 - Constitution of Ireland, 1937, Articles 34, 40, 43.
The plaintiffs were owners of property in the city of Dublin. They claimed that their property rights would be affected...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
44 cases
-
Killegland Estates Ltd v Meath County Council
...relying on Finn v. Bray Urban District Council [1969] I.R. 169, Central Dublin Development Association v. The Attorney General [1975] 109 I.L.T.R. 69 at p. 90, and Glencar Explorations Plc. v. Mayo County Council [1993] 2 I.R. 237. I would broadly accept the principle that a decision-maker ......
-
Hanrahan Farms Ltd v Environmental Protection Agency and Others
...application. A factor clearly considered of importance by Kenny J. in Central Dublin Development Association -v- Attorney General (1975) 109 ILTR 69. Mr. Gleeson for the Respondents referencing that case referred to that part of the report of the judgment of Kenny J. at page 86 where he st......
-
Sister Mary Christian and Others v Dublin City Council (No 1)
...CO-OPERATIVE v AG 1970 IR 317 CONSTITUTION ART 40 CONSTITUTION ART 43 CONSTITUTION ART 44 CENTRAL DUBLIN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION v AG 1975 109 ILTR 69 HUTTEN-CZAPSKA v POLAND 2006 45 EHRR 301 EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ART 1 SPORRONG & LONNROTH v SWEDEN 1982 5 EHRR 35 BUCKLEY v U......
-
Howard v Commissioners of Public Works
...2 W.L.R. 610; [1965] 1 All E.R. 787; 129 J.P. 202; 109 Sol. Jo. 192. Central Dublin Development Association v. Attorney General (1969) 109 I.L.T.R. 69. Cork County Council v. Commissioners of Public Works [1945] I.R. 561. Cox v. Hakes (1890) 15 App. Cas. 506; 54 J.P. 820; 6 T.L.R. 465; sub.......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Case Note: Wicklow County Council v Fortune (No 2): Foundations Built on Sand?
...to order demolition of unauthorised dwellings. 49 [2013] IEHC 255, at [5]. 50 Central Dublin Development Association v Attorney General (1975) 109 ILTR 69. 51 (1975) ILTR 69, 83-84. 52 Oran Doyle, Constitutional Law: Text, Cases and Materials (1 st ed., Clarus Press, 2008), at...