Connolly v Loughney and McCarthy
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1953 |
| Date | 01 January 1953 |
Connolly
and
Loughney and McCarthy
Combination of traders to keep prices and general conditions of supply, etc., at certain level - Predominant object of association - Price cutting - Inducing withdrawal of supplies from trader cutting prices - Conspiracy - Threats - Absence of intention to injure.
The defendants were officials of the Retail Grocery, Dairy and Allied Trades'Association which purported to fix minimum retail prices for certain goods ordinarily stocked and sold by retail grocers...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Hegarty v Governor of LImerick Prison
...1939 S30 TRIMBOLE, STATE V GOV OF MOUNTJOY PRISON 1985 IR 550 R V COTRONI 45 CCC 1 PAPALIA V REG 45 CCC 1 CONNOLY V LOCHNEY & MCCARTHY 1953 87 ILTR 49 DPP, PEOPLE V KENNY 1990 2 IR 110 DPP, PEOPLE V KEHOE 1985 IR 444 EXTRADITION ACT 1965 PART II EXTRADITION ACT 1965 S27 EXTRADITION ACT 1......
-
Taylor v Smyth
...1989 2 AER 65 METTALL UND RHOSTOFF V DONALDSON INC 1989 3 WLR 563 EEKELAAR, JOHN "THE CONSPIRACY TANGLE" 106 LQR 223 CONNOLLY V LOUGHNEY 87 ILTR 49 MESKELL V CIE 1973 IR 121 MCMAHON & BINCHY IRISH LAW OF TORTS 2ED 444–446, 574 TRU VALUE V SWITZER & ORS UNREP HIGH 10.3.1972 ROOKES V BARNAR......
-
Iarnród Éireann v Holbrooke
...UNREP SUPREME 16.12.1975 MCGOWAN V MURPHY UNREP SUPREME 10.4.1967 MASKELL V CORAS IOMPAIR EIREANN (CIE) 1973 IR 212 CONNOLLY V LOUGHNEY 87 ILTR 49 TRADE UNION ACT 1942 S2 TRADE UNION ACT 1941 S6(1) TRADE UNION ACT 1941 S6(3) NATIONAL COAL BOARD V NATIONAL UNION OF MINE WORKERS 1986 ICR 73......
-
Thomas Beausang and Another v Irish Life and Permanent Plc and Others
...of these decisions pre-dated the enactment of the Competition Act 1991 and the Competition Act 2002). 30 30. In Connolly v. Loughney (1953) 87 I.L.T.R. 49 the defendants were officials of the Retail Grocery, Dairy and Allied Trades' Association who were said to have pursued a lawful means c......
Get Started for Free