Considine v McInerney
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Date | 1916 |
| Year | 1916 |
| Court | House of Lords (Ireland) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
15 cases
- Nixon v Attorney General
-
R (Public and Commercial Services Union) v Minister for the Civil Service
...no more than entitled to such as the Acts give him. I cannot do better there than quote the phrase which Lord Buckmaster used in Considine v. McInerney, where, summing up the position, he says: “He was entitled to expect an annual allowance,” and then he goes on, in the well known words tha......
-
Wigg v Attorney General for the Irish Free State
... ... those Acts gave no right of action is clear from the cases referred to on behalf of the appellants and recognized by the House of Lords in Considine v. McInerney. F8 The Act of 1920 substituted the Civil Service Committee for the Treasury, maintaining the principle that there should be no legal ... ...
-
O'Brien v Tipperary Board of Health
...that this appeal should be dismissed. (1) Before Sullivan C.J. , FitzGibbon , Meredith and Geoghegan JJ. (1) [1908] 2 I. R. 609. (1) [1916] 2 A. C. 162. (1) [1914] 2 I. R. (2) 37 I. L. T. R. 158. (3) [1931] I. R. 381. (4) [1914] A. C. 667. (5) 47 I. L. T. R. 55. (6) 29 T. L. R. 652. (7) [19......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...33, 36, 37. 62 Connelly v. D.P.P. (1964) A.C.1254; (1964) 2 All E.R. 401; (1964) 2 W.L.R. 1145; mentioned. 275 Considine v. McInerney (1916) 2 A.C. 162; 144 L.T. 1138; 32 T.L.R.453; (4). 168 Cory v. Bristow (1877) 2 App.C.262,276. 46 Crooke v. De Vandes (1902) (9 Ves Jr. 197, 204) 32.106 E.......