Cossens, Ex p, re Worrall
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Land Commission (Ireland) |
| Year | 1820 |
| Date | 1820 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Maxwell; Cooper v Maxwell; Mirror Group Newspapers Plc v Maxwell
...co-operate, both the bankrupt and his wife and a witness. 162The earliest case to which we have been referred was Ex parte Cossens (1820) 1 Buck 531. Lord Eldon L.C. at p. 540: "I conceive that there is no doubt that it is one of the most sacred principles in the law of this country, that n......
-
X7 v Australian Crime Commission
... [1970] HCA 4; Hamilton v Oades (1989) 166 CLR 486; [1989] HCA 21. 231 See for example Ex parte Cossens; In the Matter of Worrall (1820) 1 Buck 531 at 540; In re Paget; Ex parte Official Receiver [1927] 2 Ch 85 at 87–88; Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Maxwell [1993] Ch 1 at 23–24;......
-
Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission
...[92] per Meagher JA. 455 (1989) 166 CLR 486 at 494. 456 (1883) 23 Ch D 118 at 128. 457 (1965) 114 CLR 63 at 80; [1965] HCA 49. 458 (1820) 1 Buck 531 at 540. 459 Section 117. 460 (1856) Dears & Bell 47 [ 169 ER 909]. 461 [1927] 2 Ch 85 at 87–88. 462Bankruptcy Act 1914 (UK), ss 26(2), 73. 46......
-
Bernstein and Others v Bester and Others NNO
...That is a direct parallel of the duty owed by a bankrupt which is E relied on by Lord Eldon LC in Ex p Cossets, re Worrell (1820) Buck 531 for his conclusion that the bankrupt could not rely on the privilege against self-incrimination so as to refuse to answer questions put to him in his A ......
Get Started for Free
