Cronin v Paul
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Exchequer (Ireland) |
| Date | 1881 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Ltd v Cody
...the production of the witness. 17There are few authorities on the interpretation of the Rule. Happily, one decision - Cronin v. Paul & Ors 15 ILTR 121,under the corresponding rule under the Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Ireland) 1877, is that of the Chief Baron Palles. He held that an o......
-
Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Ltd v Cody
...(NO 2) ORDER 1978 SI 133/78 UNIVERSAL COPYRIGHT CONVENTION TREATY OF ROME RSC O.39 r1 COPYRIGHT ACT 1963 S26 CRONIN V PAUL & ORS 15 ILTR 121 JUDICATURE (IRL) ACT 1877 NORTHRIDGE V O'GRADY & THOMPSON 1940 IJ 19 SHANNON V IRELAND & AG 1984 IR 548 MCGLINCHEY V IRELAND & AG 1990 2 IR 220 Syno......
-
Seamus Comerford v Carlow County Council
...That fundamental principle has been part of the civil law at least since the judgment of Palles C.B. in Cronin v. Paul (1881) 15 I.L.T.R. 121. The requirement for oral evidence to prove “the gist of the action” 36 The authors of Delany and McGrath on Civil Procedure at para. 21–03 observe:-......
-
Gaggos v Cullen
...and where justice requires that it should be made. The authorities on the rule and its predecessors are sparse. In Cronin v. Paul (1881) 15 I.L.T.R. 121, a decision on the corresponding rule under the Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Ireland) 1877, Palles C.B. held that an order should not ......
Request a trial to view additional results