Crowley v County Council of Limerick
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 11 July 1923 |
| Date | 11 July 1923 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Irish Free State) |
Appeal. (I. F. S.)
Employer and workman - "Contract of service" - Workman - Quarrying stones for County Council - Paid by the piece - Workmen's Compensation Act, 1906 (6 Ed. 7, c. 58), sect. 13.
Appeal by the applicant from an order made by the County Court Judge of Limerick, refusing an application for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1906.
From the evidence it appeared that Cornelius Crowley, the applicant, was engaged in quarrying stones for the County Council of Limerick on February 16th, 1923, and that a splinter struck him in the right eye. He was paid by the cubic yard for quarrying the stones. All the men engaged at the quarry, except Crowley and another man, were put on time work in October, 1922. The County Surveyor made this arrangement in order to test the cubic rate cost as between time rate and a rate per cubic yard. The rate for the applicant was fixed at 3s. 3d. per cubic...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Lynch v Limerick County Council
...of the Circuit Judge should be affirmed with costs. (1) Before Hanna and O'Byrne JJ. (2) [1925] 2 I. R. 61. (1) [1925] 2 I.R. 61. (2) [1923] 2 I.R. 178. (3) 48 Ir.L.T.R. (1) 48 Ir. L. T. R. 30. (2) 46 Ir. L. T. R. 69. (3) 49 Ir. L. T. R. 1. (4) 6 B. W. C. C. 87. (5) 15 B. W. C. C. 131. (6) ......
-
Wong Po Sin v New Universal Paper Co Ltd
...District Judge 4 February 1972 D.B. Gunston (Gunston & Chow) assigned for applicant. A. Tsang (A. Tsang & Co.) for respondent. (1) C.C. (1923) 2 I.R. 178 (2) (1919) 12 B.W.C.C. 493 (3) (1946) 115 L.J.P.C. 41 (4) (1969) 2 W.L.R. 1 (5) (1915) 85 L.J. (KB) 239 9 B.W.C.C. 142 (6) (1965) D.C.L.R......