Cullen v Cullen
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judgment Date | 10 July 1962 |
Date | 10 July 1962 |
Docket Number | (1960/74 P.) |
Court | High Court |
Family dispute - Father's action for injunction to restrain trespass by sons - Discretion - Father's purported informal transfer of lands to mother - Residence built on the lands by son at mother's invitation andwith father's permission - Father's attempt to exclude son from lands and house - Father estopped by conduct from denying son's title to site of house.
The plaintiff had built up a successful business at Enniscorthy and Adamstown, Co. Wexford. He lived with his family in his premises at Adamstown where he carried on the business of a licensed grocer and merchant. There was also a small farm attached to the business. The eldest son, S., left school in 1945 and joined his father in the business, and the second son, M., did likewise in 1946. A younger son, P., worked in the business from 1954. From about 1945 onwards a series of family quarrels commenced between the father on one side and the mother and sons on the other. In 1952 the plaintiff first accused his wife and children of robbing him. In 1954 S. left the house and set up in business on his own...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Mf and Ef v Jdf
...LAW ACT 1995 S16 FAMILY LAW ACT S16(2)(A) J D v D D 1997 3 IR 64 WHITE v WHITE 2000 3 WLR 1571 SMYTH v HALPIN 2 ILRM 38 CULLEN v CULLEN 1962 IR 268 GILLET v HOLT 2000 2 AER 289 BASHAM, IN RE 1987 1 AER 405 INWARDS v BAKER 1965 1 AER 446 SALVATION ARMY TRUSTEE COMPANY LTD v WEST YORKSHIRE M......
-
Doran v Thompson Ltd
...Insurance Co. Ltd. [1969] I.R. 66. 4 O'Reilly v. Granville [1971] I.R. 90. 5 The Sauria [1957] Lloyd's Rep. 396. 6 Cullen v. Cullen [1962] I.R. 268. 7 Revenue Commissioners v. Moroney [1972] I.R. 372. 8 Moorgate Ltd. v. Twitchings [1976] Q.B. 225. 9 Crab v. Arun District Council [1976] Ch. ......
-
Bellew v Bellew
...6 Maher v. Harte Barry [1960] I.R. 174. 7 Vaughan v. Cottingham [1961] I.R. 184. 8 Bridges v. Mees [1957] Ch. 475. 9 Cullen v. Cullen [1962] I.R. 268. 10 Doe d. Tomes v. Chamberlain (1839) 5 M. & W. 14. 11 Lynes v. Snaith [1899] 1 Q.B. 486. 12 Cobb v. Lane [1952] 1 All E.R. 1199. 13 Shell-M......
-
An Cumann Peile Boitheimeach Teoranta (The Bohemian Football Club Ltd) v Albion Properties Ltd and Others
...F (C) v F (JD) 2005 4 IR 154 2006 1 ILRM 37 2005/24/4885 2005 IESC 45 SMYTH v HALPIN & STOKES 1997 2 ILRM 38 1997/6/2317 CULLEN v CULLEN 1962 IR 268 MCMAHON v KERRY CO COUNCIL 1981 ILRM 419 2007/4902P - Edwards - High - 7/11/2008 - 2008 IEHC 447 JUDGMENT of Mr. Justice John Edwards 1 delive......