DPP v Flanagan
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1980 |
| Date | 01 January 1980 |
| Docket Number | [1978 No. 39 S.S.] |
| Court | Supreme Court |
(S.C.)
Director of Public Prosecutions
and
Flanagan
Whether operation and promotion of a slot machine comes within definition of unlawful gaming - Within s. 4 (1) (c) of the Gaming and Lotteries Act, 1956 - Effect of repeal of s. 10 of the Gaming and Lotteries Act 1956 - Statute - Interpretation - Repeal -Whether repeal of one section affected other sections - Whether repeal created criminal offence by implication - Gaming and Lotteries Act, 1956 (No. 2), ss. 4, 10 - Gaming and Lotteries Act, 1970 (No. 6), s. 1.
Section 10 of the Act of 1956 provided that no person should operate any slot-machine of the type there described, and s. 4. sub-s. 1 (c), of the same Act provided that no person should promote, assist in promoting, or provide facilities for any kind of gaming by means of any slot-machine...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
31 cases
-
Montemuino v Min for Communications and Others
...CONSTITUTION ART 8 CONSTITUTION ART 34 FISHERIES (AMDT) ACT 1983 S5 DODD STATUTORY INTERPRETATION 2002 PARA 11.54 DPP v FLANAGAN 1979 IR 265 MULLINS v HARNETT & DPP 1998 4 IR 426 1998 2 ILRM 304 1998/26/10487 MAXWELL ON THE INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES 12ED DPP v MOORHOUSE 2006 1 IR 421 20......
-
Equality Authority v Portmarnock Golf Club and Others & Cuddy & Keane v Equality Authority and Others
...HALKI) 1998 2 AER 23 1998 1 WLR 726 MULLINS v JUDGE HARNETT & DPP 1998 4 IR 426 1998 2 ILRM 304 1998/26/10487 DPP (BRODERICK) v FLANAGAN 1979 IR 265 1980 114 ILTR 34 DODD STATUTORY INTERPRETATION IN IRELAND 2008 EQUAL STATUS ACT 2000 S5(2)(B) EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAM......
-
Health Service Executive -v- JC
...Brennan & Ors [2015]IEHC 143; Crilly T & J Farrington Limited [2001]3 IR 252; O’Dwyer v Keegan [1997] 2 ILRM 401. DPP v Flanagan [1979] IR 265; Howard v Commissioner for Public Works [1994] 1 IR 101; B and P v United Kingdom (2002) 34 E.H.R.R. 529; and Moser v Austria (Application no. 12643......
-
DPP v Judge Devins & O'M (M)
...2003 1050 OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY 1993 DPP v CAGNEY 2008 2 IR 111 AG v CUNNINGHAM 1932 IR 28 KING v AG 1981 IR 233 DPP v FLANAGAN 1979 IR 265 CRIMINAL LAW (SEXUAL OFFENCES) ACT 1993 S14 CRIMINAL LAW (SEXUAL OFFENCES) ACT 1993 S3 INTERPRETATION ACT 1937 S21 INTERPRETATION ACT 2005 S3(2......
Get Started for Free