DPP v Kelly

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date30 July 1987
Date30 July 1987
Docket Number[C.C.A. No. 59 of 1986]
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal

Court of Criminal Appeal

[C.C.A. No. 59 of 1986]
The People (DPP) v. Kelly
The People (at the suit of the Director of Public Prosecutions)
and
Eamon Kelly

Cases mentioned in this report:—

R. v. Collister and Warhurst (1955) 39 Cr. App. R. 100.

R. v. Parks [1961] 1 W.L.R. 1484; [1961] 3 All E.R. 633; (1962) 46 Cr. App. R. 29.

R. v. Paraskeva (1982) 76 Cr. App. R. 162.

R. v. Knightbridge Crown Court, ex parte Goonatilleke [1986]; Q.B.I; [1985] 3 W.L.R. 553; [1986] 2 All E.R. 498. (1985) 81 Cr. App. R. 31.

R. v. Pestano (1981) Crim. L.R. 397.

Driscoll v. R. (1977) 137 C.L.R. 517.

Practice Note "Antecedent History of Accused and Convicted Persons"(1955) 39 Cr. App. R. 20.

Archbold Criminal Pleading Evidence and Practice 41st Ed. para. 4-306.

Criminal law - Evidence - Character of witness - Previous convictions of prosecution witness - Record unknown to defence or prosecution - Whether material to credibility of witness - Extent of duty on prosecution to inform defence.

Application for leave to appeal.

The applicant applied for leave to appeal against his conviction and sentence having been refused leave to appeal by the trial judge.

The applicant applied by way of motion dated the 6th April, 1987, to the Court of Criminal Appeal for an order pursuant to order 86, rule 4 of the Rules of the Superior Courts, 1986, for liberty to add an additional ground of appeal to the grounds already filed. The court granted liberty and the additional ground appears in the judgment, infra.

The application for leave to appeal was heard on the 18th May, 1987, and at the conclusion of argument the court allowed the application and directed a new trial and indicated that it would state its reasons at a later date.

The applicant was convicted, inter alia, of wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm, contrary to s. 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act, 1861. He denied the charges and denied being at the scene when the offences took place. The prosecution witness, who identified the applicant as being present at the scene, was not cross-examined as to his credibility however, unknown to both the prosecution and defence, he had a number of serious convictions recorded against him. It was argued on behalf of the applicant that there could have been a different verdict by the jury if this evidence had been available.

Held by the Court of Criminal Appeal (Finlay C.J., Lynch and Lardner JJ.), in allowing the application and directing a new trial, 1, that, where the prosecution was aware of a previous conviction of a prosecution witness, they should so inform the defence before the trial.

2. That if the trial judge was satisfied that the conviction could go to the credit of that witness he could permit it to be put to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • DPP v Anthony McCarthy and Others
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 25 July 2007
    ...Paraskeva (1982) 76 Cr App R 162 and People (DPP) v Cronin (No 2) [2006] IESC 9, [2006] 4 IR 329 considered; People (DPP) v Eamon Kelly [1987] IR 596 and People (DPP) v McKevitt [2005] IECCA 139 (Unrep, CCA, 9/12/2005) distinguished - Pre-trial publicity - Fair trial in due course of law ......
  • O'Callaghan v Mahon
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 30 March 2007
    ...DPP v KELLY 2006 2 ILRM 321 2006 IESC 20 R v MELVIN UNREP CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT 20.12.1993 WILSON v POLICE 1992 2 NZLR 533 DPP v KELLY 1987 IR 596 3 FREWEN 295 1987 6 1565 R v BROWN (WINSTON) 1998 AC 367 R v WARD 1993 2 AER 577 1993 1 WLR 619 R v HENNESSY 1978 68 CAR 419 O'H (M) v DPP UN......
  • Health Services Executive v Judge White & Others (notice parties)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 22 May 2009
    ...(2000) 30 EHRR 1, DPP v Browne [2008] IEHC 391 (Unrep, McMahon J, 9/12/2008), DPP v McCarthy [2007] IECCA 64 [2008] 3 IR 1, DPP v Kelly [1987] IR 596, R v Collister and Warhurst (1995) 39 Cr App R 100, R v Parks [1961] 1 WLR 1484, R v Paraskeva (1982) 76 Cr App R 162, Braddish v DPP [2001]......
  • Mallard v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 November 2005
    ...2 ILRM 493 at 500. 67 [1998] AC 367 at 379. 68McLeod v HM Advocate (No 2) 1998 JC 67 at 79 per Lord Rodger. 69The People (DPP) v Kelly [1987] IR 596. 71Commissioner of Police v Ombudsman [1988] 1 NZLR 385; R v Shaqlane unreported, Court of Appeal of New Zealand, 5 March 2001; R v Taylor unr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT