DPP v Quilligan (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1989 |
| Docket Number | [S.C. No. 367 of 1985] |
| Date | 01 January 1989 |
- Jurisdiction -Appeal against acquittal - Whether Supreme Court has ancillary jurisdiction to order retrial after appeal by prosecution against acquittal -Criminal Procedure Act, 1967 (No. 12) - Rules of the Superior Courts, 1962 (S.I. No. 72), O. 58, r. 9 - Rules of the Superior Courts, 1986 (S.I. No. 15), O. 87. rr. 2, 9, 11 - Constitution of Ireland, 1937, Art. 34.4.3.
Order 58 of the Rules of the Superior Courts, 1962, governed appeals to the Supreme Court from the High Court, until new rules of court were made in 1986. The Rules of 1962 contained no specific provisions dealing with appeals from the Central Criminal Court (the High Court exercising its criminal jurisdiction), as the only form of appeal from that court recognised at the time the Rules were made was to the Court of Criminal Appeal. Rule 9 of O. 58 contained a general provision that: "if, upon the hearing of an appeal, it shall appear to the Supreme Court that a new trial ought to be had, it may order that the judgment or order be set aside and that a new trial be had." In 1975 the Supreme Court held that it had jurisdiction under Article 34 of the Constitution to hear an appeal brought by a person who had been convicted before the Central Criminal Court. In 1982 it held that its appellate...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
O'C v DPP
...COFFIN V UNITED STATES 1895 156 US 422 ESTELLE V WILLIAMS 1976 425 US 501 DPP, PEOPLE V O'SHEA 1982 IR 384 DPP, PEOPLE V QUILLIGAN (NO 2) 1989 IR 46 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 1967 O'C (J) V DPP 2000 3 IR 478 2000 13 5164 DOWD V KERRY CO COUNCIL 1970 IR 27 O'KEEFFE V COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC ......
-
DPP v Quilligan (No. 3)
...Public Prosecutions) v. Quilligan [1986] I.R. 495; [1987] I.L.R.M. 606. The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v. Quilligan (No. 2)[1989] I.R. 46; [1989] I.L.R.M. 245. The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v. Shaw [1982] I.R. 1. The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v. W......
-
F.X. v Clinical Director of Central Mental Hospital
...S11(1) CONSTITUTION ART 34.3.1 CONSTITUTION ART 34.4.3 MCHUGH v MINISTER FOR JUSTICE & ORS 2012 IEHC 110 RSC O.84 DPP v QUILLIGAN (NO2) 1989 IR 46 O, STATE v O'BRIEN 1973 IR 50 CHILDREN ACT 1908 S103 MCDONAGH, STATE v FRAWLEY 1978 IR 131 O'BRIEN v GOVERNOR OF LIMERICK PRISON 1997 2 ILRM 349......
-
Health Services Executive v Judge White & Others (notice parties)
...Law (Jurisdiction) Bill 1975 [1977] IR 129, Kelly v O'Neill [2000] 1 IR 354, DPP v O'Shea [1982] IR 384, DPP v Quilligan (No 2) [1989] IR 46, B v DPP [1997] 3 IR 140, PC v DP [1999] 2 IR 25, Bowes and McGrath v DPP (Unrep, Supreme Court, 6/2/2003), RD Cox Ltd v Owners of MV Fritz Raabe ......