DT v FL and Attorney General (notice party)

JurisdictionIreland
CourtSupreme Court
Date2004
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • CK v JK and FMcG and Attorney General (notice parties)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 31 March 2004
    ...... APPLICANT AND J.K. RESPONDENT AND F.McG. NOTICE PARTY Citations: COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT 1947 S16 RSC O.65 GAFFNEY V GAFFNEY 1975 IR 133 BONAPARTE V BONAPARTE 1892 P 402 SHAW V GOULD 1868 LR 3 HL 55 MIDDLETON V MIDDLETON 1996 2 WLR 512 S (A) (ORSE) B (A) 2002 2 IR 428 2001/21/5790 K ......
  • CK v JK and FMcG and Attorney General (notice parties)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 31 March 2004
    ...... APPLICANT AND J.K. RESPONDENT AND F.McG. NOTICE PARTY [2004] IESC 21 NO. 100/2003 THE SUPREME COURT Synopsis: - [2004] 1 IR 224 - [2004] 2 ILRM 168 The applicant and the respondent were married at the Registry Office in Dublin in 1983. The relationship broke down and in 2001 ......
  • T(D) v L(F)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 26 November 2003
    ...1986 - Family Law (Divorce) Act, 1996 - Family Law Act, 1995 (29 & 130/2002 - Supreme Court - 26/11/2003) T & L v Attorney General - [2004] 1 ILRM 509 The applicant and the respondent are Irish citizens who were married in Ireland. Eight years after they mated the respondent accepted an “op......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT