DT v FL and Attorney General (notice party)
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Date | 2002 |
Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
M.H. v G.H.
...decisions of the High Court in the cases of McG. v. W (No. 1) [2000] 1 I.R. 96, M.E.C. v. J.A.C. [2001] 2 I.R. 399 and D.T. v. F.L. [2002] 2 I.L.R.M. 152. The learned Circuit Court judge followed the decision in McG. v. W and held that the English decree of divorce was entitled to recogniti......
-
O'Hagan (Personal Representative of the Estate of Dolan, Deceased) v Grogan
...LEGISLATION: A COMMENTARY 4ED 2011 PARA 82 PERRY v WOODFARM HOMES LTD 1975 IR 104 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 1957 S14(1) T (D) v L (F) 2002 2 ILRM 152 2001/23/6332 SUCCESSION ACT 1965 S12(1) COURTS & COURT OFFICERS ACT 1995 S45(1) EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S2 SUCCESSION ACT ......
-
T (D) v L (F)
...E.C.R. 645. Overseas Union Insurance Limited v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. (Case C-351/89 ) [1991] E.C.R. I-3317. D.T. v. F.L. [2002] 2 I.L.R.M. 152. Tavoulareas v. Tsavliris [2005] EWHC 2140 (Comm), [2006] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 109. van den Boogaard v. Laumen (Case C-220/95) [1997] E.C.R. I-1......
-
CK v JK and FMcG and Attorney General (notice parties)
...ACT 1986 JUDICIAL SEPARATION & FAMILY LAW REFORM ACT 1989 31(4) FAMILY LAW (DIVORCE) ACT 1996 S39 FAMILY LAW ACT 1995 39 T (D) V L (E) 2002 2 ILRM 152 EEC REG 1347/2000 SHATTER THE APPLICATION OF CHAOS THEORY JUDICIAL SEPARATION & FAMILY LAW REFORM ACT 1989 S2 FISHCHER V FISCHER 254 NY 463......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Around The World In 80 Days: From The Altar To The Courtroom
...of judicial activism in the lawmaking process and on the interplay of common law and statute. 36[2001] 2 IR 339; unrep HC March 2001. 37[2002] 2 ILRM 152. 38Supra n5 at 39. 39Unreported Circuit Court, 1st Feb 1999. 40The courts in these proceedings do not involve themselves with the merits ......