Dublin Corporation v McAdam (Surveyor of Taxes)
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Date | 1883 |
| Year | 1883 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ireland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
HM Revenue and Customs v Lansdowne Partners Ltd Partnership
...The principle has been described in a number of aphorisms such as 'a man cannot trade with himself' ( Dublin Corporation v M'Adam (1887) 2 TC 387, 397), 'a man cannot make a profit by taking money out of one pocket and putting it into another' ( Harris v Corporation of Burgh of Irvine (1900......
-
Sharkey (Inspector of Taxes) v Wernher
...of income tax law that a man cannot be taxed on profits that he might have, but has not, made: see, e.g., Dublin Corporation v. M'Adam, 2 T.C. 387, Gresham Life Assurance Society v. Styles, 3 T.C. 185. But this is only saying in another way that a trader is not to be charged with the receip......
-
Ua Clothasaigh v Moville District Board of Conservators
... ... the said years was apportioned, by the Inspector of Taxes, as between rates and other sources of revenue, and the ... ...
-
Nice Cheer Investment Ltd v Commissioner Of Inland Revenue
...but there must be something which the trade offers to provide by way of business.” 44. In Dublin Corporation v M’Adam 20 L.R. Ir 497, 510; 2 T.C. 387, 397, Palles C.B. “On the other hand, I think it is perfectly clear that, in order to bring this case within the operation of the Income Tax ......
Get Started for Free