Earl of Mountcashell v More-Smyth
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 12 March 1896 |
| Date | 12 March 1896 |
| Court | House of Lords (Ireland) |
More-Smyth
and
The Earl of Mountcashell.
House of Lords.
CASES
DETERMINED BY
THE CHANCERY AND PROBATE DIVISIONS
OF
THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN IRELAND,
AND BY
THE COURT OF BANKRUPTCY IN IRELAND,
AND ON APPEAL THEREFROM IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL.
1896.
Estate pur autre vie — Special occupant — Executory agreement — 1 Vict. c. 26, section 6.
Appeal by the defendant from the decision of the Court of Appeal ([1895] 1 Ir. R. 63).
Levett, Q.C., and Thomas Douglas, for the appellant.
Warmington, Q. C...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 cases
-
Horan v Horan
...1 I. R. 30, followed. In re Inman, Inman v. Inman,ELR[1903] 1 Ch. 241, and dictum of Lord Davey in Earl of Mountcashel v. More-Smyth, [1896) A. C. 158, not followed. Supreme Court. Horan v. Horan EDWARD HORAN and MARY HORAN (1) Estate pur autre vie - Devolution of estate - Special occupant ......
-
Re MOORE, DECEASED. Long v MOORE
... ... Hopwood (2). The effect of the decision of the Court of Appeal in Mountcashell v. Smyth (3) is that republication republishes the will with all its contents, including its ... ...
- Collins v Collins
-
Grealey v Sampson
... ... Dicta in Mountcashell v. Smyth , [1895] 1 I. R. 346 , discussed. Originating Summons. By his will ... I have not rested my judgment merely on the effect of republication. Earl of Mount-cashell v. Smyth ( 1 ) shows that, while a codicil brings the will down to the date of ... ...
Get Started for Free