Ecokell (Wayrom Ltd) v Hubert Steslik (Represented by Kevin Hegarty Solicitors)

• Jurisdiction: Ireland
• Judgment Date: 17 October 2018
• Judgment citation (vLex): [2018] 10 JIEC 1701
• Date: 17 October 2018
• Docket Number: FULL RECOMMENDATION DETERMINATION NO.DWT1826 r-145516-wt-14JOC
• Court: Labour Court (Ireland)

Labour Court

FULL RECOMMENDATION

WTC/18/58

DETERMINATION NO.DWT1826

r-145516-wt-14JOC

PARTIES:

Ecokell (Wayrom Limited)

and

Hubert Steslik (Represented by Kevin Hegarty Solicitors)

DIVISION:

Chairman: Mr Haugh

Employer Member: Mr Marie

Worker Member: Mr Hall

SECTION 28 (8), ORGANISATION OF WORKING TIME ACT, 1997

SUBJECT:

1 1. Alleged non-implementation of a Rights Commissioner's Decision No: r-145516-wt-14JOC

BACKGROUND:

2 2. The Worker referred his case to the Labour Court on 9 August 2018 in accordance with Section 28(8) of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997.

DETERMINATION:

3 A complaint having been made under Section 28(8) of the organisation of Working Time Act 1997 by Hubert Steslik, 8 Richmond, Wilton, Cork that his former employer, Ecokell T/A Wayrom Limited, Unit 8A, Monahan Road Business Park, Monahan Road, Cork, failed to implement a decision of a Rights Commissioner, r-145516-wt-14JOC;

4 And the said decision not having been carried out by the employer, and no appeal having been brought against the said decision within the time limit for such appeal;

5 The Court hereby determines that the said employer pay to the said employee €500.00 in accordance with the decision of the Rights Commissioner.

Signed on behalf of the Labour Court

Alan Haugh

17 October 2018______________________

MN Deputy Chairman