Fogarty v Córas Iompair Éireann
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1959 |
| Date | 01 January 1959 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
(S.C.)
Fogarty
and
Coras Iompair Eireann
Employees - Contributory scheme - Scheme modified by order made under subsequent legislation - Effect upon existing rights -Transport Act, 1944, s. 45 - Transport Act, 1944 (Section 45) Order, 1945.
The plaintiff had been employed as a railway porter by the defendant company and their predecessors for about forty-one years, when, in 1953, he left their employment without their consent some six years before he reached the normal retiring age. In 1944 his...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
W v W
...1986, FA 1983 s 3. Cases referred to in judgment Le Mesurier v Le Mesurier [1985] AC 517. Mayo Perrott v Mayo Perrott [1958] IR 336, [1958] 93 ILTR 195. Bank of Ireland v Caffin [1971] IR 123. Gaffney v Gaffney [1975] IR 133. McC v KED [1985] IR 697, [1987] ILRM 189. Quinn’s Supermarket v A......
-
Kd (Otherwise C) v Mc
...I.R. 133. Counihan v. Counihan (Unreported, High Court, Kenny J., 27th June, 1973). Mayo Perrott v. Mayo Perrott [1958] I.R. 336; (1958) 93 I.L.T.R. 195. In the matter of E.E.L. (Infant) (1938) N.I. 56. Chard v. Chard [1956] P. 259; [1955] 2 W.L.R. 98; [1955] 3 All E.R. 721. L.B. v. H.B. [1......