Gaffney v Gaffney
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 11 April 1975 |
| Docket Number | [1973. No. |
| Date | 11 April 1975 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
(S.C.)
Gaffney
and
Gaffney
Dissolution - Foreign decree of divorce - Parties domiciled in Ireland - Lack of jurisdiction - Fraud - Duress -Husband remarrying - Death of husband leaving both wives surviving - Whether first wife was the lawful wife.
In 1940 the plaintiff married her husband in Ireland and she lived there with her husband and their children. In 1957 the plaintiff petitioned the High Court of Justice in England for a decree of divorce and she represented to that court that she and her husband were domiciled in England. In January, 1959, the English court granted a decree absolute dissolving the marriage. Subsequently, the plaintiff by a written agreement surrendered improvidently certain rights conferred on...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
43 cases
-
M.H. v G.H.
...indeed so far the only, statutory intervention in the field of recognition of foreign divorce. Walsh J. stated in Gaffney v. Gaffney [1975] I.R. 133 that the law of recognition of foreign divorces was the common law and that neither the coming into force of the 1922 or 1937 Constitutions ha......
-
T v T
...of the order of the District Justice depended upon the husband being domiciled in England at the relevant time. Gaffney v. GaffneyIR [1975] I.R. 133 applied. 2. Per O'Higgins C.J. and Henchy J. - That the relevant time was the date of the service on the wife of notice of the filing of the p......
-
CK v JK and FMcG and Attorney General (notice parties)
... AND J.K. RESPONDENT AND F.McG. NOTICE PARTY Citations: COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT 1947 S16 RSC O.65 GAFFNEY V GAFFNEY 1975 IR 133 BONAPARTE V BONAPARTE 1892 P 402 SHAW V GOULD 1868 LR 3 HL 55 MIDDLETON V MIDDLETON 1996 2 WLR 512 S (A) ( ORSE ) B (A) 2002 2 ......
-
Clancy v Min Social Welfare
...ACT 1986 S5 M (C) V M (T) (NO 2) 1990 2 IR 52 WARRENDER V WARRENDER 2 CLARK & FIN 488 M (C) V M (T) 1991 ILRM 268 GAFFNEY V GAFFNEY 1975 IR 133 K D (ORSE C) V M C 1985 IR 697 T V T 1983 IR 29 BANK OF IRELAND V CAFFIN 1971 IR 123 M T T V N T T 1982 ILRM 217 C (K) V C (M) 1985 IR 697 M (C) V ......
Get Started for Free