Gallagher v Tuohy
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Chancery Division (Irish Free State) |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1924 |
| Date | 01 January 1924 |
Ch. Div., I. F. S.,
Gallagher
and
Tuohy
Libel - Interlocutory injunction - Jurisdiction - Plea of justification.
An interlocutory injunction was sought to restrain the publication of an alleged libel, pending the trial of the action. The defendants pleaded justification and swore that they would be able to justify the libel:—Held following Bonnard v. PerrymanELR, [1891] 2 Ch.269, that when a defendant takes upon himself the onus of justification and the Court is not satisfied that he may not be...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Reynolds v Malocco
...in this jurisdiction as to the proper approach to take on this topic. 31 On the one hand there is the decision in Gallogher v. Tuohy. (1924) 58 ILTR 134 where the matter complained of consisted of a circular containing defamatroy statements concerning the plaintiff in his business capacity.......
-
Tansey -v- Gill and Others
...RSC O.11 r1 DEFAMATION ACT 2009 S11(2) DEFAMATION ACT 2009 S33 REYNOLDS v MALOCCO 1999 2 IR 203 ELR 274 2002 GALLAGHER v TUOHY 1924 58 ILTR 134 CULLEN v STANLEY 1926 IR 73 DEFAMATION ACT 2009 S33(1) DEFAMATION Interlocutory injunction Publication on internet - Defence of justification - ......
-
Mercury Engineering and Others v McCool Controls & Engineering Ltd
...be two conflicting decisions in this jurisdiction as to the proper approach to take on the topic. He referred to Gallagher v. Tuohy [1924] 58 I.L.T.R. 134 at 135 where Murnaghan J. referred to the decision in Bonnard being reasonably clear that the Court should not readily restrain the publ......
-
Beaumont Hospital Board and Another v O'Doherty
...in this jurisdiction as to the proper approach to take on this topic. On the one hand there is the decision in Gallagher v Tuohy (1924) 58 I.L.T.R. 134, where the matter complained of consisted of a circular containing defamatory statements concerning the plaintiff in his business capacity.......
Get Started for Free
