Galway City Council v Samuel Kingston Construction Ltd and Another
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judge | Mr. Justice McMahon |
Judgment Date | 17 October 2008 |
Neutral Citation | [2008] IEHC 429 |
Court | High Court |
Date | 17 October 2008 |
[2008] IEHC 429
THE HIGH COURT
BETWEEN
AND
ARBITRATION ACT 1954 S36
ARBITRATION ACT 1954 S38
ARBITRATION ACT 1954 S37
KEENAN v SHIELD INSURANCE COMPANY LTD 1988 IR 89
McCARTHY v KEANE 2004 3 IR 617
LIMERICK CITY COUNCIL v UNIFORM CONSTRUCTION LTD 2007 1 IR 30
LONDON EXPORT CORPORATION LTD v JUBILEE COFFEE ROASTING CO LTD 1958 1 WLR 661
WILLIAMS v WALLIS & COX 1914 2 KB 478
PORTSMOUTH ARMS HOTEL LTD v ENNISCORTHY UDC UNREP O'HANLON 14.10.1994 1995/4/1501
TOBIN & TWOMEY SERVICES LTD v KERRY FOODS LTD & KERRY GROUP OLC 1996 2 ILRM 1
McCARRICK v THE GAIETY (SLIGO) LTD 2002 1 ILRM 55
CHURCH & GENERAL INSURANCE CO v CONNOLLY & MCLOUGHLIN COSTELLO 7.5.1981 1981/9/1523
McSTAY v ASSICURAZIONO GENERALI SPA & ANOR 1991 ILRM 237
LIMERICK CITY COUNCIL v UNIFORM CONSTRUCTION LTD 2007 1 IR 30
OMNIBRIDGE CONSULTING LTD v CLEARSPRINGS (MANAGEMENT) LTD 2004 EWHC 2276
THOMAS BORTHWICK (GLASGOW) LTD v FAURE FAIRCLIUGH LTD 1968 1 LLOYDS 16
INTERBULK LTD v AIDEN SHIPPING CO LTD (THE VIMEIRA) 1984 2 LLOYDS 66
WARBOROUGH INVESTMENTS LTD v S. ROBINSON & SONS (HOLDINGS) LTD 2003 EWCA CIV 751 2003 2 EGLR 149
VIA NETWORKS IRELAND LTD IN RE 2002 2 IR 47
FIDELITY MANAGEMENT SA & ORS v MYRIAD INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS BV & ANOR UNREP MORISON 9.6.2005 2005 EWHC 1193 COMM
RUSSELL ON ARBITRATION 23ED 2007
ARBITRATION ACT 1954 S27
ARBITRATION ACT 1954 S28
ARBITRATION ACT 1950 S17 (UK)
RSC O.28 r11
MUTUAL SHIPPING CORPORATION OF NEW YORK v BAYSHORE SHIPPING CO OF MONROVIA 1985 1 A E R 520 528
ARBITRATION ACT 1996
ARBITRATION ACT 1950 S17 (UK)
KEATING ON BUILDING CONTRACTS 7TH ED
HEYMAN v DARWINS 1942 AC 356
HUDSONS BUILDING & ENGINEERING CONTRACTS 11 ED
STUBBS v THE HOLYWELL RAILWAY COMPANY 1867 LR 2 EX 311
TAYLOR v CALDWELL 1863 27 JP 710 1863 3 B & S 826
WILLIAM NEVILLE & SONS LTD v GUARDIAN BUILDERS LTD 1995 1 ILRM 1
ZUPHEN & ORS v KELLY TECHNICAL SERVICES (IRELAND) LTD & ORS 2000 ELR 277
NORBROOK LABORATORIES LTD v TANK UNREP 2006 COLMAN EWHC 1055 COMM
ARBITRATION
Set aside
Application to remit or set aside award - Application to remove arbitrator from remainder of arbitration - Misconduct - Arbitrator asleep during hearing - Improper unilateral contact with parties alleged - Errors in award - Words used in part of award deleted - Failure to raise matters with arbitrator - IEI standard conditions of contract - Repudiation - Reasonableness - Frustration - Whether arbitrator misconducted himself - Whether errors in award so fundamental as to warrant remission - Whether arbitrator had jurisdiction to issue note explaining various conclusions in award - Whether conduct of parties unreasonable - Whether withdrawal from site constituted repudiation - Keenan v Shield Insurance Company Ltd [1988] IR 89, Re Via Net Works (Ireland) Ltd [2002] 2 IR 47 and McCarthy v Keane [2004] 3 IR 617 applied; Fidelity Management SA v Myriad International Holdings BV [2005] EWHC 1193 (Comm) followed; Limerick City Council v Uniform Construction Ltd [2005] IEHC 347 [2007] 1 IR 30, Stubbs v The Holywell Railway Company [1867] LR Ex 311, Taylor v Caldwell [1863] 3B & S 826, William Neville and Sons Ltd v Guardian Builders [1995] 1 ILRM 1, Zuphen v Kelly Technical Services (Ireland) Ltd [2000] ELR 277, London Export Corporation Ltd v Jubilee Coffee Roasting Co Ltd [1958] 1 WLR 661, Williams v Wallis and Cox [1914] 2 KB, Portsmouth Arms Hotel Ltd v Enniscorthy UDC (Unrep, O'Hanlon J, 14/10/1994), Tobin & Twomey Services Ltd v Kerry Foods Ltd [1996] 2 ILRM 1, McGarrick v The Gaiety (Sligo) Ltd [2002] 1 ILRM 55, Mutual Shipping Corporation of New York v Bayshore Shipping Co of Monrovia ("The Montan") [1985] 1 All ER 520, Heyman v Darwins [1942] AC 356, Church & General Insurance Co v Connolly (Unrep, Costello J, 7/5/1981), McStay v Assicurazioni Generali SPA [1991] 2 ILRM 237, Interbulk Ltd v Aiden Shipping Co Ltd (the "Vimeira") [1984] Lloyds Law Reports 66 considered; Omnibridge Consulting Ltd v Clearsprings (Management) Ltd [2004] EWHC 2276 (Comm), Thomas Borthwick (Glasgow) Ltd v Faure Fairclough Ltd [1968] 1 Lloyd's Law Reports 16, R v Betson [2004] EWCA Crim 254, Norbrook Laboratories v Tank [2006] EWHC 1055 (Comm) and Warborough Investments Ltd v S. Robinson & Sons (Holdings) Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 751 distinguished - Arbitration Act 1954 (No 26), ss 27, 28 36, 37 and 38 - Rules of the Superior Courts 1986 (SI 15/1986), O 28, r 11 - Applications refused (2008/6MCA - McMahon J - 17/10/2008) [2008] IEHC 429
Galway County Council v Samuel Kingston Construction Ltd
JUDGMENT of Mr. Justice McMahon delivered on the 17th day of October, 2008
In these proceedings, the plaintiff seeks to remit and/or set aside the award of the second named respondent [pursuant to sections 36 and 38 of the Arbitration Act 1954 ('the Act')] and to remove the second named defendant as Arbitrator and appoint a new Arbitrator.
Galway City Council ('G.C.C.'), the plaintiff in these proceedings, decided to redevelop Eyre Square in Galway and entered into a contract with the first named defendant, Samuel Kingston Construction Ltd. ('S.K.C.') to carry out certain construction works at the site. The contract ('the original contract'), for the sum of €6,362,388.49 inclusive of VAT, was dated the 5 th April, 2004, and incorporated, with certain amendments, the standard conditions of contract of the Institution of Engineers in Ireland ('the I.E.I. Conditions').
Work had started on the project in February, 2004 with a period of 78 weeks set for its completion and provision for liquidated damages for delay of €15,000 per week. During the course of the work, the original completion date was pushed back to the 20 th October, 2005. S.K.C. made a number of applications for extension of time under clause 44 of the I.E.I. conditions and G.C.C. issued a number of notices under clause 46 which required S.K.C. to "take such steps as are necessary and the Engineer may approve to expedite progress".
Galway City Council was anxious that the work be completed before Christmas, 2005 at the latest. When the delay began to occur a number of meetings took place between the parties in order to find a way of achieving completion within this time frame. These meetings culminated in the conclusion of an "Acceleration Agreement" in or around the 8 th March, 2005. Under this agreement, which was never reduced to writing and the exact terms of which were disputed, S.K.C. was to apply additional resources to the project over and above its contractual obligations in order to ensure its completion by November, 2005; in return, G.C.C. would make certain additional payments to S.K.C.
Although resources were increased and certain payments made, delays continued to hamper progress on the project. On the 17 th May, 2005, a site meeting took place between the parties at which the parties appear to have agreed that the Acceleration Agreement, as originally scheduled, was no longer achievable. Attempts to renegotiate failed. On the 4 th June, 2005, Mr. Frampton of G.C.C. issued Certificate No. 16 which withdrew all sums previously paid under the Acceleration Agreement. On the 27 th June, 2005, S.K.C. ceased work on the site and returned the site keys to the Engineer. On the same day, G.C.C's Engineer issued a certificate under clause 63 of the I.E.I. conditions which allowed entry onto the site and expulsion of the contractor in certain circumstances such as bankruptcy or abandonment. Clause 63(6) of the I.E.I. conditions provided that the termination rights under clause 63 "shall not be exercised unreasonably".
This gave rise to a dispute between the parties. On the 26 th May, 2006, the parties referred the dispute to arbitration. Upon application by the parties, the President of the I.E.I. appointed Mr. Geoffrey F. Hawker, the second named defendant, as Arbitrator on the 9 th July, 2006. A preliminary meeting took place on the 5 th September, 2006. On the 3 rd October, 2006, the Arbitrator directed that the arbitration would be conducted under the I.E.I. Arbitration Procedure 2000, ('the I.E.I. Procedure') and that hearing of the arbitration would take place in two stages: first a hearing on liability followed then by a hearing on quantum. S.K.C. was the claimant in the arbitral proceedings; G.C.C. was the respondent.
The hearing on liability took place in early July, 2007. This was followed by written closing submissions. On the 8 th October, 2007, the Arbitrator issued his award on liability. Subsequently, the parties sought amendments under Rule 21.3 of the I.E.I. procedure. On the 8 th December, 2007, the award was republished with certain amendments, accompanied by a 'Note of Explanation'.
In his award, the arbitrator found that there was an Acceleration Agreement which took effect from the 8 th March, 2005, and which was repudiated by G.C.C. with the wrongful withdrawal of funds in Certificate No. 16 on the 4 th June, 2005. He further found that the wrongful withdrawal of funds directly resulted in the withdrawal of S.K.C's overdraft facility and left the company at risk of trading while insolvent if it continued with its works. The Arbitrator also found, however, that G.C.C's actions of the 4 th June, 2005, did not repudiate the original contract. Furthermore, although S.K.C's withdrawal from site on the 27 th June, 2005, was a breach of this contract, it was not a fundamental breach or repudiation. The Arbitrator also found that, while the Engineer's Certificate No. 16 under clause 63(1)...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Galway City Council v Samuel Kingston Construction Ltd and Another
...came before the High Court (McMahon J.) on the 4th June, 2008, and an order was made refusing the reliefs sought by the plaintiff (see [2008] IEHC 429). By notice of appeal dated the 16th December, 2008, the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court. The appeal was heard by the Supreme Court ......
-
S.J.W. Facades Ltd v Bowen Construction Ltd and Another
...2005 IEHC 347 ARBITRATION ACT 1954 S38 GALWAY CITY COUNCIL v SAMUEL KINGSTON CONSTRUCTION LTD & HAWKER UNREP MCMAHON 17.10.2008 2008 IEHC 429 LONDON EXPORT CORP LTD v JUBILEE COFFEE ROASTING CO LTD 1958 1 WLR 661 1958 1 LLOYD'S REP 367 1958 2 AER 411 WILLIAMS v WALLIS & COX 1914 2 KB 478 MC......
-
Corrigan v Durkan
...CO LTD 1988 IR 89 1988/2/325 GALWAY CITY COUNCIL v SAMUEL KINGSTON CONSTRUCTION LTD & HAWKER UNREP MCMAHON 17.10.2008 2008/26/5603 2008 IEHC 429 DOWLING-HUSSEY & DUNNE ARBITRATION LAW 2008 PARA 8.20 ST JOHN SUTTON & ORS RUSSELL ON ARBITRATION 23ED 2007 PARA 5.090 LONDON EXPORT CORP LTD v JU......
-
Fayleigh Ltd v Murphy
... ... Galway County Council v. Kingston Construction Ltd ... Samuel Kingston Construction Ltd ... [2010] 3 I.R. 95 ... production of documentation or to force another party to call a witness who may otherwise not be ... ...