Ganley and Others v Minister for Agriculture
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 13 March 1950 |
| Date | 13 March 1950 |
| Court | High Court |
Ganley and Others v. Minister for Agriculture
JOHN GANLEY and OTHERS
Applicants
and
The MINISTER FOR AGRICULTURE
Respondent.
Fisheries Acts - Practice - Appeal against bye-low - Extension of time for appeal - Jurisdiction of the High Court - Fisheries Act 1925 (No. 32 of1925), s. 28, sub-ss. 4 and 5 - Courts of Justice Act, 1936 (No. 48 of 1936),s. 10 - Fisheries Act, 1939 (No. 17 of 1939). s. 35.
The limitation of time within which a person aggrieved by a bye-law made by the Minister, under the Fisheries Acts, may appeal to the High Court, under s. 28, sub-s. 4, of the Fisheries Act, 1925, is a statutory limitation, and the High Court has no jurisdiction to extend the time so limited.
So held by Kingsmill Moore J.
Summary Summons.
The Minister for Agriculture, by virtue of the powers conferred upon him by s....
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Cork County Council v Whillock
...S8 MALICIOUS INJURIES ACT 1981 S14(3) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 1957 S49(1) INTERPRETATIN ACT 1937 S11 GANLEY & ORS V MIN FOR AGRICULTURE 1950 IR 191 SMITH V DUBLIN CO COUNCIL 35 ILTR 110 LOCAL GOVT (IRL) ACT 1898 S5(7) GRAND JURY ACT 1836 S137 DAMAGE TO PROPERTY (COMPENSATION) ACT 1923 S21 D......
-
Irish Refining Plc v Commissioner of Valuation
...STATE V PHEASANTRY LTD UNREP HIGH 11.05.87 COMMISSIONER OF VALUATION, STATE V O'MALLEY UNREP MCWILLIAM 1984/4/1115 GANLY V MIN AGRICULTURE 1950 IR 191 BENNION STATUTORY INTERPRETATION M'KEONE, ap., BRADFORD 7 IJ (NS) 157 GAUSSEN V LOWER BANN 1929 NI 11 MONTREAL STREET RAILWAY 1917 AC 170......
-
Gammell v Dublin County Council
....v. Ryan 1979 I.R. 295 The State (Muldowney) .v. E.J. Kelleher (Costello, J., 5th February1982) Ganley .v. The Minister for Agriculture 1950 I.R. 191 Counsel for the Plaintiff: Hugh O'Flaherty, S.C. and Anthony Counsel for the Defendant: T.C. Smyth, S.C., and James Mackay 1 Judgment of Miss......
-
VA02.1.034 – Cork City Council
...the Notice Party we were referred to the section of the Valuation Act, 1988. We were also referred to Ganley v Minister for Agriculture (1950) I.R. 191. In the course of his judgment in this short case Kingsmill Moore made it clear that a statutory time limit is not capable of being extende......
Get Started for Free