Giles v Brady
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 21 February 1974 |
| Docket Number | [1971. No. 1778 P.] |
| Date | 21 February 1974 |
(H.C.)
Giles
and
Brady
Opposition by party who obtained registration - Jurisdiction of High Court - Judgments (Ir.) Act 1844 (7 8 Vict., c. 90), s. 10 - Judgments Registry (Ir.) Act, 1871 (34 35 Vict., c. 72), s. 21.
The defendants agreed to sell certain licensed premises to the plaintiff for an agreed price, and the plaintiff paid a deposit to the defendants. The plaintiff purported to rescind the contract and he issued a summons in the High Court and claimed an order declaring that the contract had...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
16 cases
-
ACC Bank Plc v Vincent Markham and Mary Casey
...(IRELAND) ACT 1858 FAMILY LAW ACT 1995 S9 S (A) v S (G) 1994 1 IR 407 1994 2 ILRM 68 BELLAMY v SABINE 1857 1 DE G & J 566 GILES v BRADY 1974 IR 462 JUDGMENTS (IRELAND) ACT 1844 S10 MURPHY & MCCORMACK, IN RE 1930 IR 322 STRONG, IN RE 1940 IR 382 REGISTRATION OF TITLE ACT 1964 S71(4) TEM......
-
A S v G S
...the purpose of the Act of 1844 was to provide a system of registration, but not to alter the nature of a lis pendens.Giles v. BradyIR [1974] I.R. 462 applied. 7. That since the notice party had been given notice of the applicant's claim by virtue of being a notice party to the application f......
-
Mason Hayes and Curran v Queally
...the time of registration of the affidavit” does no more than recognise the historical position as analysed by Kenny J. in Giles v. Brady [1974] I.R. 462 and Geoghegan J. in A.S. v. G.S. [1994] 1 I.R. 407. It acknowledges the position of a judgment mortgagee as a volunteer. It therefore sp......
-
Tola Capital Management Llc v Joseph Linders and Another (No.2)
...vacating the lis pendens pursuant to section 123(b)(ii) registered against the first and second defendants. GILES v BRADY & FITZSIMONS 1974 IR 462 JUDGMENTS (IRL) ACT 1844 S10 LIS PENDENS ACT 1867 S2 JUDGMENTS REGISTRY (IRL) ACT 1871 S21 FLYNN v BUCKLEY & JAMES WALLACE (MULLINGAR) LTD 1980......
Get Started for Free