Glover v B.L.N. Ltd (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 25 November 1973 |
| Docket Number | [1966. No. 1844 P.] |
| Date | 25 November 1973 |
(H.C.)
Glover
and
B.L.N. Ltd. (No. 2)
Loss of future earnings - Whether assessment to be based on estimated gross earnings or on probable net earnings after payment of income tax - Finance Act, 1964 (No. 15), ss. 8, 9 and 1st sch., para. 13.
Sections 8 and 9 of the Finance Act, 1964, provided for income tax being chargeable under Schedule E in respect of any payment (not otherwise chargeable to income tax) made in connection with, or in consequence of, the termination of the holding of an office or employment but the sections enacted that the tax should...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 cases
-
Hickey Company Ltd, v Roches Stores (Dublin) Ltd
...Income Tax 64 The Defendants in making this submission relied in main upon the decision of Mr. Justice Kenny in Glover .v. BLN (No. 2) 1973 I.R. 432. Mr. Justice Kenny there held that in assessing damages for wrongful dismissal consisting of loss of salary, commission and fees that so much......
-
Geoghegan v Institute of Chartered Accountants
... ... Those bye-laws were expressed to require a three fourths majority of the members. In fact, no such rules have beenintroduced ... 17 By way of example of the adoption of bye-laws, Mr. Donovan ... ...
-
Garvey v Ireland
... ... in terms - Whether such removal prohibited otherwise - Police Forces Amalgamation Act, 1925 (No. 7), s. 6, sub-s. 2 - Constitution of Ireland, 1937, Articles 40, 50. Section 6, sub-s. 2, ... ...
-
Sullivan v Southern Health Board
...argument in the High Court. Allen v. ó Suilleabháin (Unreported, High Court, Murphy J., 11 March, 1996), Glover v. B.L.N. Ltd. (No. 2)IR [1973] I.R. 432 and Hickey v. Roches StoresDLRM [1980] ILRM 107 considered. Sullivan v. Southern Health Board Patrick Sullivan Plaintiff and The Southern ......
Get Started for Free