H (T) v DPP & Judge Smithwick
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judge | Mr. Justice William M. McKechnie |
| Judgment Date | 09 March 2004 |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] IEHC 76 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [2004] 3 JIC 0901 |
| Docket Number | HC 156/04 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 09 March 2004 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Kennedy v DPP
... ... - Whether effects of prosecutorial delay outweighed public interest - Whether prejudice could be overcome by appropriate directions from trial judge - Whether delay inordinate - Whether delay excusable - M(P) v Malone [2002] 2 IR 560 followed - F(B) v DPP [2001] 1 IR 656 ; People (DPP) v ... ...
-
The Director of Public Prosecutions v Czelusniak
...2 of the Criminal Justice Act, 1951.” 14 . The operation of section 13(2) was considered in T.H. v. Director of Public Prosecutions [2004] IEHC 76, albeit that a different provision was in issue, namely s.12 of the Criminal Law (Rape) Act, 1981. This contains a similar procedural mechanism ......
-
O Connor v District Judge Walsh and Others
...these statutory provisions. 15 15. The operation of section 13(2) was considered in THv. the Director of Public Prosecutions and other's [2004] IEHC 76 in which the learned judge stated: 2 "31… Under this provision there are again a number of matters which must exist before the District Cou......