Holohan v Friends Provident and Century Life Office
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Judgment Date | 15 December 1966 |
| Docket Number | (1963. No. 506 P.) |
| Date | 15 December 1966 |
(S.C.)
Holohan
and
Friends Provident and Century Life Office
Duty of mortgagee in exercising power - Price - Parties - Mortgagor's action to restrain completion of sale - Whether purchaser a necessary party - Conveyancing Act, 1881, s. 21 (2) - Conveyancing Act, 1911, s. 5 (1).
A life insurance company in the exercise of its powers of sale as legal mortgagee entered into a contract for the sale of certain property of which the plaintiff was mortgagor. In negotiating the sale and the purchase price to...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
39 cases
- Ghazali bin Mat Noor v Southern Bank Bhd and other appeals
-
Bargaintown Ltd v Dublin Corporation
...MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS (IRL) ACT 1840 S141 MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS (IRL) ACT 1840 S139 HOLOHAN V FRIENDS PROVIDENT & CENTURY LIFE OFFICE 1966 IR 1 CAHILL V SHANNON 1980 IR 269 DUGGAN V AN TAOISEACH 1989 ILRM 710 SHEEHAN, STATE V GOVERNMENT OF IRELAND 1987 IR 550 1 Judgment of Mr. Justice ......
-
Moorview Developments Ltd and Others v First Active Plc and Others
...IR 253; Forshall v Walsh (Unrep, Shanley J, 18/6/1997); Medforth v Blake [2000] Ch 86; Holohan v Friends Provident & Century Life Office [1966] IR 1; Downsview Nominees Ltd v First City Corp Ltd [1993] AC 295; Kinsella v Somers (Unrep, Budd J, 23/11/1999); Re B Johnson & Co (Builders) Ltd ......
-
Whelan v Promontoria (Finn) Ltd
...that PFL cannot act in this manner. He also relies on the Supreme Court's judgment in Holohan v. Friends Provident & Century Life Office [1966] I.R. 1 as a statement that, if a mortgagee exercises their power of sale in a sufficiently unreasonable manner, an injunction will be warranted. A......
Get Started for Free