Huston v Wallace

JurisdictionIreland
Judgment Date25 April 1854
Date25 April 1854
CourtUnspecified Court
HUSTON
and
WALLACE.

COMMON LAW REPORTS. 225 MOORE, J.* E. T. 1854. Queen's Benc h If the defendant had not put in a defence, the plaintiff would most likely have marked judgment ; and I do not think, by his TAYLOR v. having so done, he waived his right to apply to the Court. LOW. * CRAMPTON, J., absente. HUSTON v. WALLACE. April 25. CARLETON moved for liberty to file a rejoinder, under the 48th The Court, in granting li- section of the Procedure Act. A writ of revivor had been issued berty to rejoin, will not con- on foot of a judgment, to which the defendant had pleaded the fine the rejoin- particular to an, Statute of Limitations ; and the plaintiff replied an acknowledg- d.c mat ment, in writing, within twenty years. It was sought to rejoin make hbtute or der that this acknowledgment was obtained by fraud. No notice of that defendant be...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT