E.I. Company Ltd v Kennedy and Others
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Judgment Date | 09 April 1968 |
| Docket Number | [1968. No. 705 P.] |
| Date | 09 April 1968 |
Trade dispute - Picketing - Whether prima facie evidence establishing right to picket - Whether evidence rebutted - Peaceful picketing - Trade Disputes Act, 1906, ss. 2, 5.
Some of the defendants were trade-union officials and the remainder were members of the union and employees of the plaintiff company. The local branch secretary of the union tried, from the 3rd June, 1966, to arrange a meeting between representatives of the union and of the company in order to discuss the conditions of employment of union members who were employed by the company. On the 24th July, 1967, he sought a meeting in order to discuss a claim by such members for "a reduction of their weekly working hours without loss of earnings" and on the 30th August those members asked the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Westman Holdings Ltd v McCormack
...E.C.R. 739. Educational Co. of Ireland Ltd. v. Fitzpatrick (No. 2) [1961] I.R. 345; (1961) 97 I.L.R.M. 16. E.I. & Co. Ltd. v. Kennedy [1968] I.R. 69. Gouldings Chemicals Ltd. v. Bolger [1977] I.R. 211. Litster v. Forth Dry Dock Co. Ltd. [1990] 1 A.C. 546; [1989] 2 W.L.R. 634; [1989] 1 All E......
-
Becton, Dickinson Ltd v Lee
...the judgment of Mr. Justice Walsh, in its reasoning and in its result, and I have nothing to add. 1 See p. 3, ante. 2 [1960] A.C. 132. 3 [1968] I.R. 69, 83. 4 [1961] I.R. 345. 5 [1964] A.C. 1129. 6 [1938] I.R. 749 7 [1940] I.R. 347. 8 [1958] I.R. 29. 9 [1952] Ch. 646. 10 1968 S.L.T. 65. 11 ......
-
McDonagh v McDonagh
... ... Furthermore her help will have to be augmented by others. I propose, therefore, to approach the cost of replacing the services ... ...
-
Marine Terminals Ltd & Rafferty v Loughman and Others
...Ltd [2008] IEHC 249, [2009] IR 316; Newsgroup Limited v Society of Graphical and Allied Trades [1987] ICR 181 and EI Co Ltd v Kennedy [1968] IR 69 considered; Campus Oil Ltd v Minister for Industry and Energy (No 2) [1983] IR 88 applied - Partial injunction granted (2009/7980P - Feeney J - ......