Iarnnód Éireann v Ireland
Jurisdiction | Ireland |
Judge | Keane J. |
Judgment Date | 28 April 1995 |
Neutral Citation | 1995 WJSC-HC 2405 |
Court | High Court |
Docket Number | No. 4743 P./1993 |
Date | 28 April 1995 |
1995 WJSC-HC 2405
THE HIGH COURT
BETWEEN
AND
Citations:
IARNROD EIREANN V IRELAND UNREP JOHNSON 26.2.93
CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S14(3)
CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S12(1)
CONSTITUTION ART 40.3
CONSTITUTION ART 43
TRANSPORT (REORGANISATION OF CORAS IOMPAIR EIREANN) ACT 1986 S7(7)
TRANSPORT (REORGANISATION OF CORAS IOMPAIR EIREANN) ACT 1986 S8(1)
PMPS & MOORE V AG 1983 IR 339
CHESTVALE PROPERTIES LTD V GLACKIN 1993 3 IR 35
CAHILL V SUTTON 1980 IR 269
AG V SOUTHERN INDUSTRIAL TRUST LTD 94 ILTR 161
BLAKE V AG 1982 IR 117 1981 ILRM 34
CONSTITUTION ART 40.3.2
CONSTITUTION ART 40.1
SPUC V GROGAN 1989 IR 753
AG FOR ENGLAND & WALES V BRANDON BOOKS LTD 1986 IR 597
AMBIORIX LTD V MIN FOR ENVIRONMENT 1992 1 IR 277
COX V IRELAND 1992 2 IR 503
ART 26 OF THE CONSTITUTION & THE MATRIMONIAL HOMES BILL 1993, IN RE 1994 1 ILRM 241
HEANEY V IRELAND 1994 2 ILRM 420
HAUGHEY, IN RE 1971 IR 217
SWEENEY V DUGGAN 1991 2 IR 274
WAGON MOUND, THE 1961 AC 388
GLANVILLE WILLIAMS JOINT TORTS & CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE (1951) 500 – 501 CH 22
MOYNIHAN V GREENSMITH 1977 IR 55
PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT V MIN FOR ENVIRONMENT 1987 IR 23
SALMOND & HEUSTON ON THE LAW OF TORTS 10ED
TORTFEASORS ACT 1951
MURPHY V AG 1982 IR 241
AG V SOUTHERN INDUSTRIAL TRUST LTD
EDUCATIONAL CO OF IRELAND V FITZPATRICK 1961 IR 345
EAST DONEGAL CO-OPERRATIVE V AG 1970 IR 317
INDUSTRIAL & PROVIDENT SOCIETIES (AMDT) ACT 1978
CONSTITUTION ART 43.1.1
CONSTITUTION ART 43.1.2
CONSTITUTION ART 43.2.1
CONSTITUTION ART 43.2.2
QUINNS SUPERMARKET V AG 1972 IR 1
CENTRAL DUBLIN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION V AG 1969 109 ILTR 69
CHESTVALE PROPERTIES LTD V GLACKIN 1993 3 IR 35
DPP, PEOPLE V O'SHEA 1982 IR 384
TRANSPORT (REORGANISATION OF CORAS IOMPAIR EIREANN) ACT 1986 S6(1)
TRANSPORT (REORGANISATION OF CORAS IOMPAIR EIREANN) ACT 1986 S6(2)
TRANSPORT (REORGANISATION OF CORAS IOMPAIR EIREANN) ACT 1986 S8(1)
TRANSPORT (CORAS IOMPAIR EIREANN) ACT 1950
TRANSPORT (REORGANISATION OF CORAS IOMPAIR EIREANN) ACT 1986 S8(4)
TRANSPORT (REORGANISATION OF CORAS IOMPAIR EIREANN) ACT 1986 S8(8)
TRANSPORT (REORGANISATION OF CORAS IOMPAIR EIREANN) ACT 1986 S2(1)
COMPANIES ACTS 1963 – 1991
KELLY ON THE CONSTITUTION 3ED 446–447
US CONSTITUTION ART III
O'DONOVAN V AG 1961 IR 114
RYAN V AG 1965 IR 294
BOLAND V AN TAOISEACH 1974 IR 338
MCMAHON V AG 1972 IR 69
CROTTY V AN TAOISEACH 1987 IR 713
SPUC V GROGAN 1989 IR 734
CAHILL V SUTTON 1980 IR 269
CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 PART III
CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S12(2)
CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S14(4)
CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S14(3)
MCMAHON & BINCHY ON THE IRISH LAW OF TORTS 2ED 74–76
HEYDONS CASE 1612 11 CO REP 5a, 77 ER 1150
COCKE V JENNOR 1614 HOB 66
MERRYWEATHER V NIXAN 1799 TR 186
WINFIELD & JOLOWICZ ON TORT 14ED 627
BETTS V GIBBINS 11834 2 AD & E 57
BURROWES V RHODES 1899 1 QB 825
LAW REFORM (MARRIED WOMEN & TORTFEASORS) ACT 1935 S6(1)(c)
WELLWOOD V KING 1921 2 IR 274
RSC 1905 O.15 r4
CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S12(1)
WILLIAMS JOINT TORTS & CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE
SALMOND & HEUSTON ON THE LAW OF TORTS 20ED 434
REPORT OF THE ONTARIO LAW REFORM COMMISSION ON CONTRIBUTION AMONG WRONGDOERS & CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE (TORONTO 1988)
CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S21(2)
KEEENAN V BERGIN 1971 IR 192
KELLY V JAMESON UNREP WALSH 1.3.72
O'SULLIVAN V DWYER 1971 IR 275
CIVIL LIABILITY (CONTRIBUTION) ACT 1978 S2(1) UK
LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) ACT 1945
DAVIES V SWAN MOTOR CO 1949 2 KB 291
STAPLEY V GYPSUM MINES LTD 1953 AC 663
BRITISH AVIATOR, THE 1965 1 LLOYDS REP 271
MIRAFLORAS & THE ABADESA, THE 1967 1 AC 826
BROWN V THOMPSON 1968 1 WLR 1003
MADDEN V QUIRKE 1989 1 WLR 702
CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S34(1)
TWO NEGLIGENT SERVANTS, THE 1954 17 MLR 66
CHAPMAN, CAUSATION ITSELF IS DIFFICULT ENOUGH; DEGREES OF CAUSATION WOULD REALLY BE A NIGHTMARE 1948 64 LQR 26
CONSTITUTION ART 40.3.2
CONSTITUTION ART 40.2.2
MADIGAN V AG 1986 ILRM 136
ART 26 OF THE CONSTITUTION & THE MATRIMONIAL HOME BILL 1993, IN RE 1994 1 ILRM 243
HEANEY V IRELAND 1994 2 ILRM 420
MCMAHON V AG 1972 IR 69
DE BURCA V AG 1976 IR 38
MURPHY V AG 1982 IR 241
THOMSON V ST CATHERINES COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE 1919 AC 468
HENDERSON V FOLKESTONE WATERWORKS CO 1885 1 TLR 329
CONSTITUTION ART 50.1
CONSTITUTION ART 50
CONSTITUTION SAORSTAT EIREANN ART 73
RYLANDS V FLETCHER
HOLMES THE COMMON LAW 161–162
Synopsis:
CONSTITUTION
Statute
Validity - Judgment - Enforcement - Damages - Recovery - Both defendants being concurrent wrongdoers - Joint and several judgment for entire damages entered against defendant corporation and defendant individual - Defendant individual being impecunious - Plaintiff's right to enforce judgment against defendant corporation only - Corporation found to be only 30% at fault for accident - Whether defendant corporation had ~locus standi~ to challenge constitutionality of enactment which permitted exercise of that right - Application of Article 50 to pre-existing common law - Civil Liability Act, 1961, ss. 12, 14 - Transport (Re- organisation of Coras Iompair Eireann) Act, 1986, ss. 6–8, 10–12 - Constitution of Ireland, 1937, Articles 40, 43 - Keane J. - 28/4/95) - [1996] 3 IR 321 - [1995] 2 ILRM 161
|Iarnrod Eireann v. Ireland|
Judgment delivered the 28th day of April, 1995 by Keane J.
On the 24th September, 1989, a train carrying a number of pilgrims to Knock was derailed between Ballyhaunis and Claremorris. This was the result of a collision between the train and a herd of cattle owned and driven by the fourth named Defendant (hereafter "the cattle owner"). As a result of the collision, a number of the passengers, including the fifth named Defendant (hereafter "Mr. Gaspari") suffered injuries. The cattle had come from land owned by the third named Defendant (hereafter "the land owner") on to a crossing known as "Diskin's crossing".
Mr. Gaspari issued proceedings claiming damages in respect of the injuries he had sustained and which, he alleged, were caused by the negligence and breach of duty of the first named Plaintiffs who operated the train service (hereafter "Iarnrod Eireann"), the land owner and the cattle owner.
The action was heard by Johnson J. who delivered a reserved judgment on the 26th February, 1993. He found that both Iarnrod Eireann and the cattle owner had been negligent and that Mr. Gaspari had suffered loss and damage as a result. He assessed the damages at £16,000. He further found that the land owner had not been concerned in the arrangements to drive the cattle and that, accordingly, he was entitled to be dismissed from the proceedings.
Having found that Mr. Gaspari's injuries had been caused by the negligence of Iarnrod Eireann and the cattle owner, the learned Judge apportioned liability pursuant to S.21 of the Civil Liability Act, 1961(hereafter "the 1961 Act") on the basis of 30% against Iarnrod Eireann and 70% against the cattle owner. Mr. Gaspari expressly declined to agree to accept an apportionment of the damages between Iarnrod Eireann and the cattle owner according to their degrees of fault pursuant to Section 14(3) of the 1961 Act.
In the result, under the provisions of S.12(1) of the 1961 Act, Iarnrod Eireann and the cattle owner, as "concurrent wrongdoers" within the meaning of the Act, were each liable for the whole of the damage. As the cattle owner is a person without any significant means, the right of contribution enjoyed by Iarnrod Eireann in respect of 70% of the damages is of no value. Counsel on behalf of Iarnrod Eireann indicated during the hearing that they wished to challenge the constitutionality of the relevant provisions of the 1961 Act and, the issues of liability and damages having ??? their pleadings so as to raise this issue. Johnson J was also informed at that stage that Mr. Gaspari had been paid his damages in full. Johnson J. gave leave to Iarnrod Eireann to make the proposed amendments on their undertaking to serve notice on the Attorney General. An appeal was taken from the order of Johnson J. and allowed by the Supreme Court who took the view that any challenge to the constitutional validity of the 1961 Act should be by way of independent proceedings. An appeal was also taken from the decision of Johnson J. in the substantive action, but his findings as to the liability of Iarnrod Eireann and the cattle owner and as to the apportionment of fault between them were upheld by the Supreme Court.
The present proceedings were then instituted by Iarnrod Eireann and the second named Plaintiff (hereafter "Mr. Dowling") who is the secretary of, and the holder of one share in, Iarnrod Eireann. Although the land owner had been named as a defendant, a notice of discontinuance was served as against him, and Mr. Fitzgerald S.C. applied at the outset on behalf of the cattle owner for an order dismissing him also from the proceedings on the ground that his presence was unnecessary. That application was not contested on behalf of Iarnrod Eireann and Mr. Dowling and, accordingly, the cattle owner was dismissed out of the action, the question of his costs being reserved until the conclusion of the proceedings. The action in the result proceeded solely against the first and second named Defendants (hereafter "The State") and Mr. Gaspari.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The Health (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill 2004
...BLAKE v AG 1982 IR 117 1981 ILRM 34 MADIGAN v AG 1986 ILRM 136 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 1957 IARNROD EIREANN v IRELAND 1996 3 IR 321 1995 2 ILRM 161 CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 WHITE v DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL 2004 1 IR 545 2004 2 ILRM 509 ESB v GORMLEY 1985 IR 129 HOUSING (PRIVATE RENTED DWELLI......
-
Hanrahan Farms Ltd v Environmental Protection Agency and Others
...... APPLICANT -and- THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, IRELAND AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RESPONDENTS -and- JIM NOONAN, EILEEN .... . 21 The Applicant relied on Iarnród Eireann -v- Ireland [1996] 3 IR 321 as authority for the proposition that corporate bodies enjoyed the ......
-
Daly v Revenue Commissioners
...1967 S58 FINANCE ACT 1987 S18 FINANCE ACT 1990 S26(1) CONSTITUTION ART 40.3.2 HEANEY V IRELAND 1994 2 ILRM 420 IARNROD EIREANN V IRELAND 1995 2 ILRM 161 CHAULK V R 1990 3 SCR 1335 FINANCE ACT 1990 S15 FINANCE ACT 1990 S18 FINANCE ACT 1987 S18 FINANCE ACT 1990 S26 1 Mr. Justice Costello Deli......
-
White v Bar Council of Ireland
...665. Humphrey v. Minister for the Environment [2001] 1 I.R. 263; [2001] 1 I.L.R.M. 241. Iarnród Éireann v. Ireland [1996] 3 I.R. 321; [1995] 2 I.L.R.M. 161. Lovett v. Gogan [1995] 3 I.R. 132; [1995] 1 I.L.R.M. 12. McGowan v. Labour Court [2013] IESC 21, [2013] 3 I.R. 718; [2013] 2 I.L.R.M. ......
-
Men of Straw? Change to the Rules of Locus Standi: An Unsuspected Side Effect of the McKenna and Hanafin Decisions
...observed by the organs of government. " [1987] IR 713, 766. 12 Unreported, High Court, 8 December 1995. 13 Ibid. at p. 23. :4 [1995] 2 ILRM 161. '5 It was SPUC v. Coogan [1989] IR 734 which authorised this relaxation of the rules on ius tertii. [Vol. I Trinity College Law Review expenditure......
-
Social and Affordable Housing: Part V of the Planning and Development Bill, 1999
...the Bill represents a disproportionate interference with the property rights of residential developers and whether it constitutes an 1" [1995] 2 ILRM 161. 12 Ibid., at 165. 13 Unreported, High Court, 27 February 1998, Budd J. 14 Ibid. [Vol. 3 Trinity College Law Review "unjust attack" under......