IELCA 15 - Tola Capital Management -v- Linders & Ors.

Year2017
Decision Date05 June 2014
[2017] IELCA 15
THE HIGH COURT 2014 4500 P
BETWEEN TOLA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC PLAINTIFF
AND
JOSEPH LINDERS, PATRICK LINDERS, (AND BY ORDER OF THE COURT MADE ON THE
5TH DAY OF JUNE 2014) LINDERS OF SMITHFIELD LIMITED, EQUIPOINT LIMITED AND
EQUISIDE LIMITED. DEFENDANTS
RULING ON DEFENDANTS' COSTS
1. The Plaintiff sought the following interlocutory injunctive reliefs against the Defendants:
1) An Order restraining the Defendants from completing a debt purchase agreement with
Ulster Bank in respect of the properties, the subject matter of the proceedings,
otherwise than in trust for the Plaintiff.
2) An Order restraining the Defendants from placing on the market, selling, transferring,
assigning, disposing of, charging or otherwise dealing with the properties the subject
matter of the proceedings save in accordance with the terms of Method A: Loan
Structure of the Binding Option Agreement between the parties dated 6 February 2014.
3) An Order directing the Defendants to provide evidence confirming that the Defendants'
alternative financing for the debt purchase agreement entered into with Ulster Bank
consisted entirely of debt with no third-party equity participation.
2. The Plaintiff is a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Delaware United
States and has its principal place of business in New York, United States. The Defendants were
sued in their personal capacities.
3. The Defendants wished to enter into an agreement with Ulster Bank to buy back certain loans
which they owed to Ulster Bank and which were secured on properties which either they, or
companies controlled by them, owned. In order to buy back these loans they needed to obtain
finance from alternative financiers. One possible financier was the Plaintiff and, it was the
Defendants' case that the role of the Plaintiff in the renegotiation of the Defendants' refinancing
of the loans with Ulster Bank was that the Plaintiff would provide evidence of alternative funding
to Ulster Bank.
4. It was the Plaintiff's case that the parties entered into a Binding Option Agreement on 6
February 2014. Under the terms of the Option Agreement, the Defendants granted the Plaintiff
an exclusive option to acquire certain properties. The agreement also set out two possible
structures to purchase the properties, the subject of the option, as follows:
1) Method A Loan Structure
2) Method B Partnership Structure.
5. Paragraph 1 of the Option Agreement provided that the first and second named Defendants
would negotiate the purchase of the loans from Ulster Bank in return for a full and final release
by Ulster Bank of all claims over the companies, the individuals and the properties. Tola agreed
to provide the Linders with letters demonstrating proof of funds which the Linders were
authorised to present to the bank in connection with negotiating a price for the purchase of the
loans.
6. Paragraph 2 of the agreement provided that for a period of 30 to 45 days after the date in
which the bank provided written notice of its acceptance of the purchase price, the parties
would negotiate to reach an agreement for the purchase of the properties under the terms of
Method B: Partnership Structure as set out in the agreement.
7. Paragraph 3 of the Option Agreement provided that, in the event that the parties were unable
to reach agreement on the terms of the purchase of the properties under Method B Partnership
Structure, then, "Tola shall have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase the properties
under the terms of Method A loan structure as set out in the agreement." It also provides that
Tola could exercise its option by sending a notice of intent to purchase to the Linders within
seven days of the expiration of the negotiation period.
8. Paragraph 4 of the agreement provided as follows:
"Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Linders may, within seven days of receipt of the
notice from Tola exercising the option to purchase, elect not to proceed with a purchase
pursuant to the terms of Method A Loan Structure by notice of intent to decline the loan
structure purchase to Tola so long as all of the following conditions are met:
(a) The Linders shall have obtained alternative financing comprised entirely of debt with
no third-party equity participation, sufficient to allow the Linders to effect the purchase
of the loans from Ulster Bank; and
(b) The Linders pay the sum of €500,000 to Tola within 30 days of the Linders' notice to
decline the purchase."
9. The Plaintiff provided the Defendants with letters demonstrating proof of funds and
subsequently the Defendants entered into an agreement with Ulster Bank for the repurchase of
the loans on 23 April 2014. The terms of this agreement were provided to the Plaintiff by the
Defendants. The parties then entered into negotiations to see if they could agree a partnership
structure under the Binding Option Agreement. These negotiations proved inconclusive and on

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex