Ingle v O'Brien
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1975 |
| Date | 01 January 1975 |
| Court | High Court |
(H.C.)
Ingle
and
O'Brien
Taxi driver - Revocation of licence - Natural justice - Audi alteram partem - Revocation invalid - Road Traffic (Public Service Vehicles) Regulations, 1963 (S.I. No. 191), art. 36 - Road Traffic (Public Service Vehicles) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations, 1970 (S.I. No. 200), art. 2 - Constitution of Ireland, 1937, Article 40.
The prosecutor, a taxi driver, had been granted a licence to drive licensed public hire vehicles but the licence was revoked by the respondent, a...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
19 cases
-
The State (Crothers) v Kelly
...in admittedly somewhat different circumstances. In applying the maxim I was guided by the judgment of Pringle J. in Ingle .v. O'Brien 109 I.L.T.R.7. I feel that it would be inconsistent to depart from the view which I then took in the present case. The Corporation urges that the maxim has ......
-
Moran v Attorney General
...case against the making of the revocation. East Donegal Co-Operative v. The Attorney GeneralIR [1970] I.R. 317 and Inglev. O'BrienDLTR, 109 I.L.T.R. 7 applied. 2. That the defect in the manner in which the power of revocation was exercised was not cured by the fact that, subsequently, the p......
-
Shatter v Guerin
...I refer to two decisions on the public licensing side, often referred to in this context, the first of which is Ingle v. O'Brien [1975] 109 I.L.T.R. 7, where it was held that a right of appeal, with full procedural rights, was not sufficient to neutralise the absence of affording the holder......
-
McNamee v The Revenue Commissioners
...and Hogan (op cit.) at paras. 14 ? 275 and 14 ? 276. There had been earlier decisions of the High Court, namely, Ingle v. O'Brien (1975) 109 I.L.T.R. 7 and Moran v. Attorney General [1976] I.R. 400, in which it had been found that a failure to allow a person who had been affected by a deci......
Get Started for Free