J. W. v M.W.

JurisdictionIreland
JudgeMr. Justice Doyle
Judgment Date05 July 1978
Neutral Citation1978 WJSC-HC 2129
Docket Number1978/No. 336 SP Ct 8
CourtHigh Court
Date05 July 1978

1978 WJSC-HC 2129

THE HIGH COURT

1978/No. 336 SP Ct 8
WHITE v. WHITE
In the matter of the Guardianship of Infants Act 1964
and in the matter of A W and L W, infants
J W
Plaintiff
M W
Defendant
1

JUDGMENT delivered by Mr. Justice Doyle on 5th July 1978

2

The Plaintiff in this case seeks relief under the Guardianship of Infants Act 1964, in particular that he should be awarded custody of the two children of his marriage to the Defendant. Objection has been taken on behalf of the Defendant to the jurisdiction of this Court to deal with the matter. It is claimed that both parties, although born in Ireland, have lived and worked in England where they have acquired a domicile of choice; that both children of the marriage were born in England and are domiciled there, and that consequently all questions of law affecting the right of the family inter se are justiciable only by the English courts.

3

It is well settled law that cogent evidence is required to displace a domicile of origin and to demonstrate that it has been superseded by a domicile of choice. In my view of the evidence, it falls far short of the proof required; on the contrary, it demonstrates on the part of the Plaintiff, who is the party moving the Court, a firm and continuing intention to preserve his domicile of origin.

4

Both Plaintiff and Defendant were born and brought up in Ireland, but each has lived in England for more than twenty years, where they followed their respective employments, and where they married in 1970. At an early stage, marital relations deteriorated. The marriage was scarcely ever a happy one. For some years after their marriage the parties lived in a house which they had purchased at Stratford in an Eastern section of London. Their dissatisfaction with living conditions there is evidenced to some extent by their investigation from time to time of the possibility of emigrating to New Zealand, Australia and the United States of America. Eventually, with a view to rescuing their marriage and improving the prospects of rearing their children, husband and wife decided to sell their Stratford house; with the proceeds they purchased a house and approaching an acre of land in the husband's native county at a place called Brookville, about one mile from the town of Tipperary. The husband, who was a plumber by trade and also possessed other skills in the nature of house repair and decoration, set about refurbishing the new...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • A C W v Ireland
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1994
    ...is not obliged to enquire into the welfare of the child before ordering his or her return to another jurisdiction. J.W. v. M.W.DLRM [1978] ILRM 119; D.A.D. v. P.J.D. (Unreported, High Court, Blayney J., 7 February, 1986) and L.R. v. D.R. (Unreported, High Court, Costello J., 2 April, 1992) ......
  • L.R v D.R
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1994
    ...re Marriage of Nasica 758 Pacific Reporter (2nd) 240. Northhampton County Council v. A.B.F. and M.B.F. [1982] I.L.R.M. 164. W. v. W. [1978] I.L.R.M. 119. Special summons. The facts are summarised in the headnote and fully set out in the judgment of Costello J., post. By special summons issu......
  • Wadda v Wadda
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 6 July 1993
    ...MORENAS 1945 IR 291 COMPANIA NOVIERA VASCONGADO V SS CRISTINA 1938 AC 485 BYRNE V IRELAND 1972 IR 241 CONSTITUTION ART 27.3 W (J) V W (M) 1978 ILRM 119 D (D A) V D (P J) UNREP BLAYNEY 7.2.86 1987/2/371 R (L) V R (D) UNREP COSTELLO 2.4.92 1992/4/0936 WAVIN PIPES LTD V HEPWORTH IRON CO LTD 19......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT