Johnston v O'Neill
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Date | 1911 |
| Court | House of Lords (Ireland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 cases
-
Wallis's Cayton Bay Holiday Camp Ltd v Shell-Mex and B.P. Ltd
...to he taken into account in determining the sufficiency of a possession". This passage was cited with approval by Lord Macnaghten in Johnson v. O'Neil (1911) A.C. 583 and by Lord Shaw in Kirley v. Cowderov (1912) A.C. 599. 60 In my judgment, when the land in question is being held primarily......
-
Max Couper and Another v Albion Properties Ltd and Others
...is based on the decisions of the House of Lords in Bristow v Cormican (1878) 3 App Cas 641, Malcolmson v O'Dea (1863) LR 10 HL 592 and Johnston v O'Neill [1911] AC 552. Counsel for APL submitted that these decisions (and that in Dysart v Hammerton) made it clear that, where there is a dispu......
-
Mabo v State of Queensland (No2)
...Stanford v HurlstoneELR (1873) LR 9 Ch App 116 657. Lord Advocate v Lord LovatELR (1880) 5 App Cas 273, at 288; Johnston v O'NeillELR [1911] AC 552, at 583; Kirby v CowderoyELR [1912] AC 599, at 602–3 658. McNeil, pp 196–204 659. See for instance Lands Acquisition Act 1989 (Cth), Pt VII; La......
-
Paki and Others v Attorney-General of New Zealand
...which it was common ground that the Lough Neagh was a publicly navigable lake. See the later case on the same issue, Johnston v O'Neill [1911] AC 552 (HL) at 572 per Lord Ashbourne. In Bloomfield v Johnston (1867) IR 8 CL 68, which concerned fishing in Lough Erne, the same assumption was ma......
Request a trial to view additional results