Johnston v O'Neill
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Year | 1911 |
| Date | 1911 |
| Court | House of Lords (Ireland) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
31 cases
-
Max Couper and Another v Albion Properties Ltd and Others
...is based on the decisions of the House of Lords in Bristow v Cormican (1878) 3 App Cas 641, Malcolmson v O'Dea (1863) LR 10 HL 592 and Johnston v O'Neill [1911] AC 552. Counsel for APL submitted that these decisions (and that in Dysart v Hammerton) made it clear that, where there is a dispu......
-
Wallis's Cayton Bay Holiday Camp Ltd v Shell-Mex and B.P. Ltd
...to he taken into account in determining the sufficiency of a possession". This passage was cited with approval by Lord Macnaghten in Johnson v. O'Neil (1911) A.C. 583 and by Lord Shaw in Kirley v. Cowderov (1912) A.C. 599. 60 In my judgment, when the land in question is being held primarily......
-
Mabo v State of Queensland (No2)
...Stanford v HurlstoneELR (1873) LR 9 Ch App 116 657. Lord Advocate v Lord LovatELR (1880) 5 App Cas 273, at 288; Johnston v O'NeillELR [1911] AC 552, at 583; Kirby v CowderoyELR [1912] AC 599, at 602–3 658. McNeil, pp 196–204 659. See for instance Lands Acquisition Act 1989 (Cth), Pt VII; La......
-
Lettsome v Lettsome
...in determining the sufficiency of possession.’ 54 This passage was cited with approval by Lord Macnaghten in ( Johnston v. O'Neill [1911] Ac 552 at 538 and Lord Shaw in Kirby v. Cowderoy [1912] AC 599 at 603). In my judgment, when the land in question is being held primarily for its develop......
Get Started for Free