Johnstone v Pedlar
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Court | House of Lords (Ireland) |
| Judgment Date | 24 June 1921 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 161 |
| Date | 24 June 1921 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
35 cases
- Kesultanan Pahang v Sathask Realty Sdn Bhd
-
Attorney General v Nissan
...act of Captain Walker could be justified as act of State "is wholly untenable". Following that case, the House of Lords in Johnstone v. Pedlar, 1921, 2 A.C., p. 262, declared emphatically that. "This doctrine (of act of State) has no application to any case where the plainti......
-
Ruddock v Vadarlis and Others
...... Musgrove has however also been cited (by way of obiter dicta) as authority for a broad proposition that the sovereign can exclude aliens: Johnstone v. PedlarELR [1921] 2 AC 262; [1921] All ER Rep 176 at AC 275 per Viscount Cave, AC 296 per Lord Phillimore; R v. Carter ; Ex Parte KischUNK ......
-
Bradley v Commonwealth of Australia
...... HenryUNK (1936) 55 CLR 608, at 644; [1936] ALR 482.[1] Although, in those passages, mention is made of British subjects, it is clear since Johnstone v PedlarELR [1921] 2 AC 262; [1921] All ER Rep 176,[2] that an alien, other than an enemy alien, is while resident in this country, entitled to the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
National litigation and international law: repercussions for Australia's protection of marine resources.
...(Lord Herschell for Lords Watson, Hobhouse, Hersehell, Macnaghten, Morris, Hannen, Sir Richard Couch and Lord Shand); Johnstone v Pedlar [1921] 2 AC 262,272-3 (Viscount Findlay), 276-7 (Viscount Cave), 281,284 (Lord Atkinson), 295-6 (Lord Phillimore). Both cases were approved by the High Co......
-
Debating the nature and ambit of the Commonwealth's non-statutory executive power.
...Robtelmes v Brenan (1906) 4 CLR 395, 400 (Griffith CJ). (329) See ibid 400-3, 407-14 (Barton J), 420-2 (O'Connor J); Johnstone v Pedlar [1921] 2 AC 262, 275 (Viscount Cave), 296 (Lord Philimore); A-G (Canada) v Cain [1906] AC 542, 546 (Lord Atkinson); Musgrove v Toy [1891] AC 272, 283 (Hals......