King v David Allen and Sons Billposting Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Ireland |
| Date | 1916 |
| Year | 1916 |
| Court | House of Lords (Ireland) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
31 cases
-
National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
...was not in actual occupation and the licence was held not to bind successors. One was a licence to affix advertisements on a wall: King v. David Allen, 1916, 2 Appeal Cases, 54. The other was a licence to exercise "front of the house" rights in a theatre: see Clove v. Theatrical Properties......
- Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold
-
Jamaica Public Service Company Ltd v Rose Marie Samuels
...licence could not be binding upon the licensor's successors in title, even if the successor had notice of the licence (see King v David Allen & Sons, Billposting Ltd [1916] 2 AC 54 ). The law then moved, under the guidance of Lord Denning MR, to the position where a contractual licence was ......
-
Clear Channel UK Ltd v Manchester City Council
...[1887] 19 QBD 288, Wilson v Tavener [1901] 1 Ch 579, Provincial Bill Posting Co v Low Moor Iron Co [1909] 2 KB 344, King v David Allen & Sons, Billposting, Ltd [1916] 2 AC 54, Kewal Investments Ltd v Arthur Maiden Ltd [1990] EGLR 193, and Rochester Poster Services Ltd v Dartford Borough Cou......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Estoppel in land law
...will be a licence before the detriment occurs: it is the nature of the assumption or expectation that may or may not be proprietary. 82 [1916] 2 A.C. 54. The licensee was suing the licensor, who would have escaped liability if the successor in title (lessee) had been bound. 83 [1936] 3 All ......
-
OF PROHIBITIONS ON ASSIGNMENTS, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND NEGATIVE PLEDGES IN COMMERCIAL LAW: CLOGS ON COMMERCE
...way to go in this regard as there is no established concept of good faith in commercial transactions. 23 King v David Allen & Sons Ltd [1916] 2 AC 54. 24 Clore v Theatrical Properties Ltd [1936] 3 All ER 483. 25 Enington v Errington [1952] 1 All ER 149, Binions v Evans[1972] Ch 359, DHN Foo......