Laurence Corrigan v Ken Fennell

JurisdictionIreland
JudgeMr. Justice Twomey
Judgment Date14 March 2017
Neutral Citation[2017] IEHC 183
Docket Number[2016 No. 5339P]
CourtHigh Court
Date14 March 2017

[2017] IEHC 183

THE HIGH COURT

CHANCERY

Twomey J.

[2016 No. 5339P]

BETWEEN:
LAURENCE CORRIGAN
PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT
-AND-
KEN FENNELL
DEFENDANT/APPLICANT

Property & Conveyance – Mortgage – Deed of Appointment – Validity of Appointment as Receiver – Abuse of Process

Facts: The applicant/defendant sought the dismissal of the plaintiff's proceedings alleging that the statement of claim had failed to disclose reasonable cause of action. The applicant contended that the respondent/plaintiff had failed to abide by the process of law. The respondent claimed that the Deed of Appointment would be invalid.

Mr. Justice Twomey held that the application to dismiss the proceedings would be granted. The Court observed that the statement of claim had failed to disclose the reasonable cause of action. The Court found that the respondent's conduct of proceedings amounted to an abuse of process of law. The Court reiterated that the validity of the appointment of the applicant, as a receiver under the Deed of Appointment, had already been determined by the Courts.

EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT of Mr. Justice Twomey delivered on the 14th day of March, 2017.
1

This is an application to dismiss the plaintiff's proceedings, pursuant to Order 19, r. 28 of the Rules of the Superior Courts or pursuant to the Court's inherent jurisdiction, on the grounds that they disclose no reasonable cause of action and/or are frivolous or vexatious and/or are an abuse of process.

2

The primary claim in the plaintiff's statement of claim is that the defendant acted as a receiver of a supermarket premises at Oulart, Gorey, County Wexford, (the "premises") pursuant to an invalid Deed of Appointment which was executed by KBC Bank Ireland plc on the 21st July, 2014, and which also purported to appoint the defendant as a receiver the premises and to three other properties. All four properties the subject of the Deed of Appointment were owned by the plaintiff's brother, Mr. Hugh Corrigan.

3

The plaintiff states in his affidavit that he is the tenant of his brother in relation to the premises at Oulart.

No reasonable cause of action
4

For its part, the defendant has provided a sworn affidavit of Shane O'Connor dated 17th January, 2017, which provides compelling evidence that the Deed of Appointment in this case was in fact validly executed by Kevin Geraghty and Ian Larkin on behalf of KBC Bank Ireland plc pursuant to Article 84(c) of that Bank's Articles of Association and in light of a Board Minute of the Bank dated 13th December, 2013. The defendant has also produced to the Court the original Deed of Appointment duly sealed on the part of the Bank.

5

No evidence has been provided by the plaintiff to controvert this averment of Mr. O'Connor. On this basis, this Court is of the view...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • Fennell v Corrigan
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • February 18, 2020
    ...the plaintiff was not entitled to possession of the properties the subject matter of the receivership. In separate proceedings (Record No 2017 IEHC 183) Laurence Corrigan issued proceedings against this plaintiff, alleging an invalid appointment of the receiver over the Oulart property. On ......
  • Corrigan v Fennell
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • February 18, 2020
    ...Court, from the order of Twomey J in the High Court of 14 March 2017 dismissing his plenary summons proceedings as being vexatious; [2017] IEHC 183. This involved the judge analysing a deed of appointment and its circumstances and deciding as a matter of fact that the plaintiff could not su......